Christ did not say the sentence (Go into all the world and preach the Gospel to all creation)

 Chapter One: The texts that say that Christ, peace and blessings be upon him, ordered the disciples to preach among the Gentiles are false and distorted texts. Christ did not say the phrase: “Go into the whole world and preach the Gospel to all creation.”

Introduction:
God willing, I will begin a series on the topic that Christ, peace and blessings be upon him, was sent to the children of Israel only
. In this section, I will analyze the texts that talk about Christ, peace and blessings be upon him, asking his disciples at the end of the Gospels to go and preach to all nations. These sentences were not written by the true writers of the Gospels, as they are foreign to the texts.
These texts are:

From the Gospel of Matthew we read:

Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth.
Matthew 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Matthew 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you. And lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age. Amen.

From the Gospel of Mark we read:

16:15 And he said to them, Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.
Then he says:
16:20 And they went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed the word by the signs following. Amen.

From the Gospel of Luke we read:

24:47 And that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem

. But in reality, all of these sentences are distorted sentences that were added at times later than the writing of the Gospels.
The truth is that the disciples did not hear that sentence from Christ, peace and blessings be upon him.

This is the evidence from the holy book of Christians:

1- The contradiction between what is stated in (Acts 10:42) and what is stated at the end of the Gospels:

The Book of Acts, which Luke wrote after writing his Gospel, and in which he wrote about events that occurred after the ascension of Christ, peace be upon him, that is, after the events recorded in the Gospels, and which are supposed to have occurred after that sentence written at the end of his Gospel, as well as the end of the Gospels,

we see in this book, and on the tongue of Peter, he says:
10:41 Not for all the people, but for witnesses whom God chose beforehand for us, who ate and drank with him after his resurrection from the dead.
10:42 And he commanded us to “preach to the people” and to testify that this is the one appointed by God as the judge of the living and the dead.

The people here, that is, the children of Israel, so we read from the New Testament a description of the children of Israel as a people, so we read:
Matthew 9:35
And Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing Every sickness and every weakness among the people .

Matthew 21:23 And when he came to the temple
, the chief priests and the elders of the people came to him as he taught, and said, “By what authority do you do these things? And who gave you this authority?” Luke 3:18 And many other things he exhorted and preached to the people . Luke 20:1 Now it came to pass on one of those days, as he was teaching and preaching in the temple, that the chief priests and the scribes stood with the elders, Acts 4:1 And while they were speaking to the people , the priests and the captain of the temple and the Sadducees came upon them, Acts 5:20 “Go, stand in the temple and tell the people all the words of the gospel . This life.” Acts 5:25 Then someone came and reported to them, saying, “Look, the men you put in prison are standing in the temple, teaching the people !” Hebrews 9:19 For when Moses had spoken every commandment according to the law to all the people, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled the book itself, and all the people. Jude 1:5 Now I want to remind you, even if you knew this once, that after the Lord had saved the people out of the land of Egypt , he also destroyed Those who did not believe. They were addressing, teaching, and speaking to the people (i.e. the children of Israel) , which means that the people that Peter spoke about in (Acts 10:42) were ((the children of Israel))























Luke tells us in the Acts of the Apostles on the tongue of Peter that the commandment that Christ, peace be upon him, gave to his disciples was to preach to the people (i.e. to the Jews) and not to all nations.

What is this? Isn’t it supposed according to the texts of the Gospels that Christ’s commandment to his disciples after his resurrection was to preach to all nations? So how does Luke tell us something different here???

This simply has only one meaning, which is that Luke never heard in his life that Christ, peace be upon him, commanded the disciples to preach to all nations, and that at the time Luke wrote his words, no one had ever read or heard that Christ told them to preach among the nations. This sentence was added to all the Gospels at later times after the writings of the Gospels, meaning that they are distorted texts , but the distorter did not pay attention to this simple sentence found in the Acts of the Apostles. This is from the mercy of the Lord of the Worlds to mankind, that He makes the distorter leave evidence of his crime and distortion. This means that the message of Christ, peace be upon him, was only for the children of Israel, so there is no doctrine of crucifixion and redemption.

2- Peter still needs a vision that tells him that he can deal with Gentiles. So where is Christ’s commandment to him, peace and blessings be upon him, at the end of the Gospels???!!!

We see a text in the Book of Acts that claims that Peter saw a vision and understood from it that it meant that he should call a Gentile person,
so Peter needed a vision that would command him to address the Gentiles and inform them
(Acts 10:11 to 10:28). We read:
10:10 And he became very hungry and desired to eat. And while they were preparing for him, a trance fell upon him.
10:11 And he saw heaven opened, and a vessel descending upon him like a great sheet bound at the four corners and let down to the earth.
10:12 And in it were all the beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and birds of the air.
10:13 And a voice came to him, “Arise, Peter; kill and eat.”
10:14 But Peter said, “No, Lord; for I have never eaten anything common or unclean.
” 10:15 And a voice came to him again the second time, “What God has cleansed, do not call common.”
10:16 And this happened three times. Then the vessel was taken up again into heaven.
10:17 And while Peter doubted in himself what the vision which he had seen might mean, behold, the men which had been sent from Cornelius, which had inquired for Simon's house, stood at the door.

Peter sees a vision and at first he does not know its meaning, then we see that he understood the meaning, which is to preach to a Gentile person , so we read:
10:28 And he said to them, “You know how it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or come to a foreigner. ” But God has shown me that I should not call any man common or unclean.

We will analyze the meaning of what Peter said (according to the Acts of the Apostles):

10:28 And he said to them, “You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a Jew to associate with or visit a foreigner; but God has shown me that I should not call any man common or unclean. ”

A- He says that it is forbidden for a Jewish man = there is no religion called Christianity because Christ was a prophet sent to the children of Israel only like Isaiah, John the Baptist, and Jeremiah because Peter considered himself a Jewish man.

B- It is forbidden for a Jewish man to “stick to or come to a foreigner” = The teachings after the ascension of Christ were still the same as the teachings of the Jews.

C- It is forbidden for a Jew to come to a foreigner = preaching among the nations is forbidden, not just eating. That is, the intended action is speaking and preaching, while eating is merely a symbol

, which means that until Peter saw that vision, he had never heard about the subject of preaching among the nations.

D- As for me, God has shown me that I should not say about a person that he is unclean or impure = it goes back to the reason for his action that contradicted the teachings of the Jews, which is that he came to them and told them that it was the vision that he saw, and not to the teachings of Christ or their demand for the apostles to preach among the nations,

as he knew that from the vision and not from the teachings of Christ, peace and blessings be upon him.

Peter interpreted the vision according to Luke’s words:
Eating = preaching among people. Eating is not unclean in the vision = man is not unclean in reality,
meaning that he preaches even among those who are not circumcised, meaning among other nations. That is, Christ never said it.

The question now is:
If Christ commanded them to preach among the Gentiles in the last Gospels and this command was known to everyone, then why does the Book of Acts claim that Peter needed a vision to tell him about this?????!!!!

When we read the Book of Acts: -
10:29 ((Therefore I came)) without contradiction, since ((you sent for me, and I ask you for what reason you sent for me))
10:30 Then Cornelius said, For four days now I have been fasting until this hour, and at the ninth hour I was praying in my house, and behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing
10:31 And said, Cornelius, your prayer is heard, and your alms are remembered before God.
10:32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call for Simon, whose surname is Peter, for he is lodged at the house of Simon a tanner by the seaside; when he comes he will speak with you.
10:33 So I sent for you at once, and you did well to come. ((And now we are all present before God to hear all things that God has commanded you))
10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth and said, Of a truth I perceive that God shows no partiality
10:35 But in every nation he that feareth him and doeth righteousness is acceptable to him.

((Therefore)) = connects what came before it to what came after it. Before it, the vision told him that man is not impure. What came after it was his summoning in order to teach them what God had commanded him to do.

This means that preaching among the nations was not permitted before the vision in the Acts of the Apostles on the tongue of Peter.

No one had heard or known that Christ, peace be upon him, had commanded the disciples to preach among the Gentiles when Luke was writing the Book of Acts,
so he placed this text which claims that Peter saw a vision commanding him to do so in order to justify preaching among the Gentiles,
which I will explain, God willing, later on that even this vision is not true because, quite simply, the disciples did not preach among the Gentiles at all, but among the Jews in the Gentiles.

(( Note:
The strange thing about this vision is that Peter said in it that he would not eat anything unclean, meaning that even after Christ was raised up, there was forbidden food, which means that Christ never told the disciples that everything that enters the mouth is not unclean, but rather it is the words of Paul and his followers who wanted to abolish the law))

3- The followers of Christ, peace and blessings be upon him, were angry with Peter because he ate with Gentiles (Acts 11:1 to 11:3). This means that Christ, peace and blessings be upon him, did not command them to deal with Gentiles and preach the gospel among them.

We read from the Book of Acts:
11:1 Now the apostles and the brothers who were in Judea heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God.
11:2 And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, those of the circumcision contended with him,
11:3 saying, Thou wentest in to uncircumcised men, and didst eat with them.

Peter had to justify this to them because of the vision he had seen, and no one had ever said that Christ had commanded them after his resurrection to go and preach to all nations.

How could the disciples rebuke Peter for preaching to a Gentile and eating with him, if Christ, peace and blessings be upon him, commanded them to preach among the Gentiles and if he told them that: “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man” (Matthew 15:11)?

Then, is there a person who preaches among nations a religion that urges peace and brotherhood, and at the same time does not sit and eat with them?????!!!!

It is assumed that Christ, peace be upon him, told them to preach among the nations what he taught them (according to the end of the Gospels), and it is assumed that he told them that the Jews adhere to superficial customs and not to the core and essence of the commandments.

This means that when they go to preach among the nations ((what he taught them)) they will eat with them and sit with them, but the disciples do not do that and blame Peter for that, and Peter originally needed a vision to tell him that
unless the truth is that Christ never told them to go and preach to all nations.

4- When Peter was defending his dealings and eating with the Gentiles in front of the rest of the disciples, he did not justify that with the actions or words of Christ, but rather “justified it with the vision only.” This means that Christ, peace and blessings be upon him, never commanded them to preach the gospel to the Gentiles:

(Acts 11:4 to 11:18) We read:
11:4 Then Peter began to explain to them in order, saying,
11:5 I was in the city of Joppa praying, and in a trance I saw a vision: a vessel descending, like a great sheet let down from heaven by four corners. It came to me.
11:6 As I gazed intently at it, I saw four-footed beasts of the earth, wild animals, creeping things, and birds of the air.
11:7 And I heard a voice saying to me, “Arise, Peter; kill and eat.”
11:8 But I said, “No, Lord, for nothing common or unclean has ever entered my mouth.”
11:9 But a voice answered me from heaven the second time, “What God has cleansed, you must not call common
.” 11:10 This happened three times, and they were all drawn up to heaven again.
11:11 And behold, three men stood at the house where I was, sent to me from Caesarea.
11:12 And the Spirit told me to go with them, doubting nothing. And these six brothers also went with me.
11:13 And
we entered the man’s house. 11:14 And he told us how he had seen an angel standing in his house, and saying to him, Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon, who is surnamed Peter. 11:14 And he will speak to you words by which you will be saved, you and all your house.
11:15 And when I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, as upon us at the beginning.
11:16 Then I remembered the word of the Lord, how he said, “John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.”
11:17 Now if God has given them the same gift as we have, believing on the Lord Jesus Christ, who am I that can stop God?
11:18 And when they heard this, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, “Then God has given the Gentiles also repentance to life.”

Why in the Book of Acts do we find Peter “justifying” his actions to the disciples with the vision only and never mentioning anything about Christ’s teachings, his command to them, and his dealings with the illiterate?????!!!!

Because it did not exist at the time the book of Acts was written.

- Isn’t it in the Gospels that Christ told them to preach to all nations “what I have taught you”? So why does Peter need to defend himself and his eating with Gentiles before the disciples if Christ taught them to eat and interact with Gentiles “and changed the Jewish thinking of the disciples”?

((Because quite simply, until the time Luke wrote the Book of Acts, there was nothing in the Gospels that said that Christ dealt with Gentiles or that he ordered his disciples to preach to all nations)

5- Jesus, peace be upon him, specified that his message would only be among the children of Israel:

We read from the Gospel of Matthew:

Matthew 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent out, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter not.

Matthew 10:6 ((But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel))

Also: -

Matthew 15:22 And behold, a Canaanite woman came out of that region, and cried out to him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David: my daughter is grievously demon-possessed.

Matthew 15:23 But he did not answer her a word. Then his disciples came and begged him, saying, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”

Matthew 15:24 He answered and said, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

A- Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was sent only to the lost sheep of the House of Israel:

The phrase (I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel) means that these are the limits of his message that he explained to his disciples, which is that his message will always remain to the children of Israel and the situation will not change.
The question is: Was Jesus, peace be upon him, lying to his disciples when he said to them (I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel) ??
Definitely not,

but the liar is the one who distorted the texts to delude people with the universality of the message of Jesus, peace be upon him, in order to justify to his followers a fictitious doctrine that God Almighty did not authorize, called the doctrine of the deification of Christ, the crucifixion, and redemption. If
the matter was a test for women, as Christian scholars claim, Jesus, peace be upon him, would not have told his disciples that information, but he would have said (wait a little) or even been silent, but he did not do that because his message and mission were actually only to the children of Israel.

B- Jesus, peace be upon him, defined his message to the Children of Israel and the reason for his departure.

We read from the Gospel of Mark:

1:38 Then he said to them, “Let us go on to the neighboring towns, that I may preach there also, for that is why I came out.”

1:39 And he preached in their synagogues throughout all Galilee, and cast out demons.

From the Gospel of Luke:

4:42 And when it was day, he went out and departed to a deserted place. And the crowds were searching for him, and they came to him and seized him, lest he should go away from them.

4:43 And he said to them, “I must preach the kingdom of God to the other cities also, for for this purpose I have been sent.”

4:44 ((So he preached in the synagogues of Galilee))

The texts are clear. He went out to preach in the synagogues of the Jews, meaning that his message was to the children of Israel (God willing, I will discuss these texts more in the sixth chapter).