Distortion of the text of Acts 2:30 by adding (raises Christ according to the flesh)

 Distortion of the text of Acts 2:30 by adding (raises Christ according to the flesh)

- Among the texts that were tampered with by the copyists of the manuscripts is a text that appears in Acts 2:30, which speaks of a person from the lineage of David who will reign and sit on David’s throne:
“For he was a prophet, and knew that God had sworn an oath to him to appoint a child from his lineage on his throne.” This text
,
in the same form, appears in the oldest and best manuscripts of the New Testament. It is found in the same form in the Sinaitic, Vaticanian, and Alexandrian manuscripts... in all of them the text was approximately as follows 👇


The text is emptied from the
Sinaiticus θρονον θρονον αυτου



..;
But... in the later copies of the New Testament manuscripts... an unusual addition to the text began to appear; the text turned into a prophecy about Jesus by the copyist adding the phrase:
( τὸ κατὰ σάρκα ἀναστήσειν τὸν χριστόν, και - He raises up the Christ according to the flesh)


👈 in a desperate attempt to prove that Jesus is the one who was prophesied to inherit the throne of David!!
,
as in the Beza manuscript for example;
The text appeared in it as follows : καρπου τησ οσφυοσ αυτου👉 επι τον The last text


👈 Obviously ... the contradiction of the later text with the older and better manuscripts is evidence of its distortion.
...;
* Therefore, it was natural for all the copies and critical translations to delete this anomalous sentence from the textual context ( τὸ κατὰ σάρκα ἀναστήσειν τὸν χριστόν, και - He establishes Christ according to the flesh)


;
👈 It is deleted from the Nestle-Aland version, the Westcott-Hort version, the UBS version, the Samuel Tregelles version, the Tischendorf version, and
other critical versions that relied on the oldest and best manuscripts of the New Testament; and were done by the most knowledgeable people on earth about the text of the New Testament. The text in almost all of them was as follows
(
NA26)
καθίσαι ἐπὶ τὸν θρόνον Now,



..;
While the regular Greek versions that depend in their translation on the received text mentioned the increase in the body of the text... The Greek text ((the received text))
1894 ScrivenerTextusReceptus

προφητης ουν υπαρχων και ειδως οτι ορκω καρπου της οσφυος αυτου 👉το κατα σαρκα αναστησειν 30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins,👉 according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ👈 to sit on his throne ..


؛



👈 While the addition was deleted in all English versions and translations, this word was deleted completely; such as versions (AMP - ASV - NIV - RV - RSV - BBE - CEV - GNB - GW - ISV - NRSV) and others; the text in them was as follows 👇
New International Version
But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne.

===؛
* As for the Arabic translations; As usual, we did not find this addition except in the Van Dyke translation... which relied in its translation on the received text... the worst and most despicable type of texts...
Acts 2:30
"Therefore, being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn to him with an oath that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne"
...;
👈 while all modern Arabic translations have deleted this anomalous addition; it is not found in the Jesuit translation, nor in the Pauline, nor the Simplified, nor the Common, nor the Sarah, nor the Life.... They all deleted this sentence!
(And he establishes the Christ according to the flesh, he establishes the Christ according to the flesh)

=;


* Regardless of the fact that the text destroys the idea that Christ is a true son of the Lord; because it says that Christ is from the "fruit of the loins" of David.... and not the Lord...;

however, the copyist's attempt to prove that David prophesied that Jesus is the one who will inherit David's throne and will be a king sitting on his throne... is an attempt that proves the extent of the copyists' ignorance of the texts of their Holy Book!!
;
👈 According to the texts of the Holy Book, Jesus cannot become a king on David's throne; Because he is from the descendants of King Jehoiakim... and according to the account of the First Book of Chronicles, he is one of the grandfathers of Jesus.
1 Chronicles 3
“These are the sons of David... 10And the son of Solomon, Rehoboam, and his son Abijah... And the sons of Josiah: the firstborn, Johanan; the second, Jehoiakim; the third, Zedekiah; the fourth, Shallum...”
,
👈 God forbade the kingship to this Jehoiakim from his descendants, as the Torah mentioned in Jeremiah 36:30
“Therefore thus says the Lord concerning Jehoiakim king of Judah: He shall have no one to sit on The throne of David”
👇
So how dare Christians say that the one who will reign and fulfill the prophecy is Jesus, who is from the lineage of Jehoiakim... who was deprived by the Lord?!!


....;
* Also.. Jesus’ lineage in the Old Testament is that he was born out of adultery... After Lot committed adultery with his two daughters in Genesis 19... “The two daughters of Lot conceived by their father. 37And the firstborn bore a son, and called his name Moab; and he is the father of the Moabites to this day. 38And the younger also bore a son, and called his name Ben-ammi; and he is the father of the children of Ammon to this day.”

👈
And the decisive texts indicate that whoever comes from this wrong path does not enter the assembly of the Lord; as in Deuteronomy 23
"2The son of a bastard shall not enter the congregation of the Lord; even to the tenth generation none of them shall enter the congregation of the Lord. 3The Ammonite and the Moabite shall not enter the congregation of the Lord; even to the tenth generation none of them shall enter the congregation of the Lord forever."


👇
And take this piece with you... Boaz, the grandfather of Jesus, was born of Rahab, the famous prostitute of Jericho; and Boaz fathered Obed from Ruth the Moabite who uncovered his feet before she gave birth to Obed.


So if this Ruth was a Moabite; And it is attributed to Moab, the son of Lot, from his eldest daughter, and we find in the genealogy of Matthew and Luke that Ruth the Moabitess is the grandmother of Jesus from David......... ;
..;
👈 So how will Jesus enter the congregation of the Lord and how did the Christians believe that he will reign on the throne of David; while he is of Moabite lineage... and the son of fornication... and deprived of this great honor forever?!!
==


* Based on the above... we find that the Jews realized that Jesus is not the awaited Messiah, based on their knowledge of Jesus' origin, lineage, and people; while the awaited one who is coming is a stranger whom the Jews do not know because he is from the house of Levi and not from the house of David.
;
Indeed, Jesus himself confirmed the truth of the sign they mentioned for the absent and awaited Messiah, saying in John 7
: “Some of the people of Jerusalem said, ‘Is this not he whom they seek to kill? 26And behold, he speaks boldly, and they say nothing to him. Do the rulers know for certain that this is the Messiah? 27But we know where this man is from, but when the Messiah comes, no one will know where he is from.’” 28Then Jesus cried out as he taught in the temple, “You know me and you know where I am from. I did not come of myself, but he who sent me is true, whom you do not know. 29I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me.”


👈 So Christ mentioned that he was a messenger from God, and that he was not the one they were waiting for, for they did not know him.
And
those to whom he spoke believed, and understood that he was not the awaited Messiah, as in John 7
: “And they sought to lay hold of him, but no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come. 31And many of the crowd believed in him, and said, ‘When the Christ comes, will he do more signs than these which this man has done?’”
...
Jesus testified explicitly that he was not the awaited Messiah; and this is what those who were his contemporaries believed; and therefore we find that Jesus did not rule over the children of Israel for a single day, and his message did not carry any earthly salvation for the children of Israel; Rather, he often fled in fear of the brutality of the Jews!!
...
Jesus is the grandson of Jehoiakim, whom God had forbidden, along with his descendants, to be king forever.


Jesus is from the lineage of the sons of Moab, who were forbidden from entering the assembly of the Lord forever.


The Jews knew that the awaited Messiah was from the lineage of Levi and not from the lineage of David,


and the Holy Bible... is distorted