Distorting the Gospel to Transform Jesus from a “Servant of God” to a “Boy of God”

 Distorting the Gospel to Transform Jesus from a “Servant of God” to a “Boy of God”

- One of the funny things that distinguished Christianity is that they established their laws of faith before they chose the books of their Holy Book...
"It is known by consensus that faith preceded the Book."

The laws of Christian faith were established in the year 325 at the Council of Nicaea; while they established the first list of their Holy Book in the year 397!!!
;
That is why we find many texts in which the pious copyists suffered as they tried to combine a human, pagan law of faith with texts of a Holy Book that contradicted this faith; so they had no choice but to change and alter the word of the Lord to conform to their faith... pagan!!
-
In fact, these attempts were the subject of ridicule by the pagans since the first centuries of Christianity; In his book The Pastoral Letters as Composite Documents, the researcher James D. Miller quotes the mockery of the pagan Celsus from the second century AD about the copyists of the word of God, saying:
(Some believers act as if they were in a drinking party, going so far as to contradict themselves; they change the original text of the Gospel three or four times or more and change its style; so that they can deny the difficulties when they are criticized) A.H.

,
* As an example of what these pious copyists were doing in manipulating the texts of their book; To support a pagan belief for which there is no clear evidence from the texts of their book... A text mentioned in Acts 3:13 The text from the Van Dyck translation preferred by Arab Christians:
“The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified his servant Jesus...”
,
and also the words of Peter in Acts 3:26... from Van Dyck:
“To you first, God having raised up his servant Jesus, sent him to bless you in turning every one of you from his wickedness”
,
and also the words of Peter and John before the Jews in Acts 4:27... from Van Dyck :
“Indeed, they gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom Herod anointed"
,
and also the text of Acts 4:30 from the words of Peter and John while they were addressing the Jews... from Al-Fandyk
"Stretch out your hand to heal, and let signs and wonders be done in the name of your holy servant Jesus"
...; four texts on the tongue of Jesus' disciples describing him as "the servant of the Lord" .... but ... but .... * By referring to the best and oldest manuscripts of the Bible, we found that the Greek word used to describe Jesus is the word (παιδα) which means (servant) and not (boy) as the Christians distorted it in their later manuscripts!!! *If we review these texts in the Sinaiticus Codex, the Vaticanus Codex, the Alexandrian Codex, the Bezae Cantabrigiensis Codex, and the Ephraemi Rescriptus, we will find that: - The text of Acts 3:13 mentions on the tongue of the disciples that Jesus was merely a “slave” ὁ Θεὸς Ἀβραὰμ καὶ Ἰσαὰκ καὶ Ἰακώβ, ὁ Θεὸς τῶν πατέρων ἡμῶν, ἐδόξασεν τὸν Παῖδα servant αὐτοῦ Ἰησοῦν ... ,














-The text of Acts 3:26 also stated that Jesus was merely a servant
of God. ἀπέστειλεν αὐτὸν εὐλογοῦντα ὑμᾶς ...
-
And in the text of Acts 4:27 we find Jesus described as a servant
. ἐπ' ἀληθείας ἐν τῇ πόλει ταύτῃ ἐπὶ τὸν ἅγιον Παῖδα servant σου Ἰησοῦν ...
,
- In the text of Acts 4:30, the disciples also described Jesus as a servant
. καὶ The oldest and best manuscripts of the Bible describe Jesus as a mere “ servant of God ,” which later scribes changed to “ a young man ” in defense of Jesus’ alleged divinity



. The slave ...; * Referring to the critical copies; Such as the Nestle-Aland version, the Westcott-Hort version, the UBS version, the Samuel Tregelles version... the Tischendorf version... and others... we will find a consensus of these versions based on what was mentioned. In the oldest and best manuscripts of the Greek New Testament the word servant is used; The text in all of them was as follows - Acts 3:13 as an example: ΠΡΑΞΕΙΣ 3:13 Greek NT: Nestle 1904 ὁ Θεὸς τῶν πατέρων ἡμῶν, ἐδόξασεν τὸν Παῖδα servant αὐτοῦ Ἰησοῦν, ὃν And so in the rest of the texts.... A slave of God , not a boy; as the copyists distorted it in defense of their human god!!! ..; * As for the English versions and translations; most of them used Transcriptions and translations of the word (servant); Such as the versions (AMP - ASV - NIV - RV - RSV - BBE - CEV - GNB - GW - ISV - NRSV) and other critical versions such as the NET Bible. has glorified His Servant Jesus... ; while a few translations have stuck to the infamous Erasmus translation; using the word (Son); such as the MSG translation; and of course the KJV The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus... ..؛ * As for the Arabic versions, such as the Van Dyck version and some Arabic translations, such as the Sarah and Common translations, the Pauline and the Life translations, they chose the word “his youth” following in the footsteps of the later distorters. So that they do not make themselves a laughingstock among Muslims! Acts 3:13 “The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus…” The Catholic version and the Jesuit translation chose the word “his servant” based on its presence in the oldest and best manuscripts of the Bible. Acts 3:13





























"The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus..."
,
while versions such as the simplified translation and the Holy Bible translation chose the word "his servant"; which is close to the word "his servant" in translation.
Acts 3:13
"But the Lord of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the Lord of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus."



For information, the meaning of the Greek word Παῖδα , which was translated according to the Jesuit fathers as "slave" in
Strong's Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries,
is a word that means specifically
a slave or servant


=== ;
* Whoever reads the texts of the Holy Bible will find that Matthew preceded the later copyists in distorting this word; out of shame of describing Jesus as a servant , when he deceived and claimed that the text of Isaiah contained a prophecy about Jesus; As in Matthew 12:17-18
, “That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying, ‘Behold, my servant whom I have chosen, my beloved in whom my soul delights,’”
but
by referring to the text of Isaiah 42:1 we will find that the root of the word is “servant” and not “boy” as Matthew claimed in his Gospel:
“Behold, my servant whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom my soul delights. I have put my Spirit upon him, and he will bring forth justice to the Gentiles.
”
The question now is for every fair-minded person who respects his mind and seeks the truth:


If what the unknown copyists did in clearly changing the words of the Lord to support the divinity of Jesus is not called distortion, then what is your definition of distortion?

If the Bible described Jesus as a human being, the son of man, a prophet, and a “servant of God,” then what is the explicit text that demolishes all these texts and proves to you the divinity of Jesus?