Qadianiyya, Jewish abjad calculation, and the group of idiots!

         When the belief is fragile, its owners become more foolish, indifferent and irrational!

Whenever a belief is unable to stand up to facts, its adherents are like a drowning man clinging to a straw!

Many people ask me : Why do Christians cite verses from the Holy Quran to prove the validity of their belief?!

I replied : Their belief is not able to prove its validity, so they turn to the Qur’an to interpret its texts according to their sick imagination.

The Qadiani sect did the same, as its claim is based on weak and fabricated hadiths, strange sayings, arbitrary interpretations of verses of the Holy Qur’an, deviation from the text, and innovation in the original.

The Qadianis had no choice but to use the "Jewish Abjad numerical system" to prove their false beliefs! It is well known that the Jewish Abjad numerical system assigns numerical values ​​to the letters of the alphabet so that the sum of several letters gives them a numerical value. This numerical value symbolizes, according to the Jewish system, a specific topic or a specific date... that's what they claimed!

This is an example of calculating the abjad.

Values ​​of letters according to the abjad calculation

A = 1  H = 8  S = 60  T = 400

B = 2  T = 9  A = 70  Th = 500

C = 3  Y = 10 F = 80  K = 600

D 4= K = 20 S = 90 D = 700

H = 5 L = 30 Q = 100 D = 800

W = 6 m = 40 r = 200 d = 900

Z = 7 N = 50 Sh = 300 G = 1000

Arrange the letters according to (Abjad Hawaz Hati Kulman Sa’fas Qarasht Thakhdh Dhadhgh).

Not in the known order (A, B, C, D, H, Kh, D, etc.).

This Jewish account was used by Mustafa Thabet, the Qadiani, in his book “The Purified Biography,” in which he narrates the biography of his alleged prophet to prove the truthfulness of the lying Qadiani and that God ordered him to establish the group of believers so that he would be the Caliph, the awaited Mahdi, and the promised Messiah! Mustafa Thabet says:

The promise of succession came in the Holy Qur’an in the Almighty’s saying:

(( Allah has promised those among you who believe and do righteous deeds that He will surely make them successors upon the earth .)) (An-Nur: 55).

It is known that the Arabs used the letters of the alphabet to express numerical numbers, as each letter of the alphabet has a limited numerical value. Sometimes they used certain words that express the numerical value of the sum of the letters of those words, specific numbers, or specific quantities, or dates of important events and incidents. The use of the letters of the sections in the Holy Quran indicates this purpose, as many commentators have said.

The noble verse in which the promise of succession was mentioned in Surat An-Nur... the word (li-yistakhalnahum) was mentioned in it, and when we calculate the numerical value of this word, we find a strange surprise... which is that the sum of the value of the letters of this word is exactly equal to the same year in which the command to take the pledge of allegiance and form the group of believers was revealed, which is the year 1305 AH... as is clear from the following:

They will not be replaced

30 + 10 + 60 + 400 + 600 + 30 + 80 + 50 + 5 + 40 = 1305

Thus, God Almighty fulfilled His promise, and the command from God Almighty finally came down to take the pledge of allegiance in the year 1305 AH, corresponding to 1888 AD. (Al-Seerah Al-Mutaharah: Chapter Five, pp. 3, 4).

The truth is that Mustafa Thabet’s words reminded me of what the Christians said before him when they claimed that the beginning of Surah Maryam (Kaf Ha Ya Ain Sad) = 195, which is the same value as (The Messiah is my God)!

Certainly, these are the tricks of the helpless who despaired of God’s mercy, so God decreed misery for them and made them an example and a laughingstock.

This nonsense is only said by someone who is convinced of the shallowness of the weak beliefs he holds that cannot stand up to argument and evidence. It is possible for me to extract words of condemnation of the lying Qadiani, the total of which is = 1305, and I say that this is a miracle!!

How did Thabit know that the verses meant the Hijri calendar and not the Gregorian calendar?!

Whenever an explanation comes to you that invalidates your claims, you reject it, and whenever you find nonsense that supports you, you accept it? What is wrong with you? How do you judge, you followers of the lying Qadiani?

But we do not descend to the level of the followers of the boy who cling to illusions and lies.

Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi says about the Jewish abjad calculation:

(( The abjad calculation is not based on a logical basis :

Then, “abjad calculation” itself is just a term used by a group of people, but it is a purely arbitrary term, not based on logic, reason or science.

Who arranged the letters in this way: A B C D E W Z H T Y K L M N S A F S Q R SH T TH Kh Dh Dh Z Gh?

Why is it not arranged like this: A B C D E F G H K H D Dh R Z etc? Or arranged in any other way?

Who gave the number (1) to the letter alif and the number (2) to the letter ba’ and so on in units up to the letter ta’, then gave the letter “ya” the number (20) and the letter ka’ (30) and so on, increasing by tens up to the letter that equals (100) and after that the increase is in hundreds.

Why wasn't the increase in ones to the last letter? Why didn't it start with ten, or one hundred, or one thousand? Why wasn't it like this: Alif (1), B (10), C (20), and so on? Why wasn't it like this: 1, 10, 100, 1000, etc. . . ? Why, why?

All of this is controlled by its terminologists. It is true that there is no dispute over terminology, but this does not bind anyone.

The story mentioned by Al-Baydawi is not reliable:

The story mentioned by Al-Baydawi (Hashiyat Al-Shihab ‘ala Al-Baydawi, Al-Maktaba Al-Islamiyya, Turkey 1/172) and mentioned by other commentators as well, and the author of the article cited it as evidence that the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace , approved of the Jews’ understanding of what they understood from the disconnected letters at the beginnings of the surahs, and that it refers to the duration of the Muhammadan message according to the method of “calculating the letters” because he, may God bless him and grant him peace, smiled when he heard what they said, and his smile indicates his approval of them!

This story is not scientifically proven, and it was not narrated with a sound or good chain of transmission, but rather with a weak chain of transmission that cannot be relied upon . It was deemed weak by Al-Hafiz Ibn Kathir in his Tafsir (Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Azeem 1/38), Al-Suyuti in Al-Durr Al-Manthur (Al-Durr Al-Manthur 1/23), Al-Shawkani in Fath Al-Qadeer (Fath Al-Qadeer 1/31), and Ahmad Shakir in Takhreej Tafsir Al-Tabari (Tafsir Al-Tabari 1/218, Dar Al-Maarif Press). So it is no longer permissible to use it as evidence, since a weak narration cannot be relied upon by scholars.

        However, even if we assume that this story is true, it is not a text indicating the truth of what the Jews say about calculating the letters, and what they inferred from the letters. This is what Al-Baydawi himself mentioned, whom the writer cited as evidence. He mentioned this statement among other statements in interpreting these letters, with mention of what each statement provided as evidence, including the evidence for this statement from the aforementioned story, claiming that the Messenger’s confirmation of their deduction is evidence of that. . . Then the scholar Al-Baydawi began to respond to the statements he narrated one by one, including this Jewish statement in his source. He mentioned that these letters were not used to calculate the letters, so they were included in the Arabic letters. He said: There is no evidence in the hadith, because it is possible that he - may God bless him and grant him peace - smiled in amazement at their ignorance. . That is, because they interpreted what was revealed in the Arabic language with meanings that are not from the meanings of the Arabic language, as Al-Shihab said in his commentary on Al-Baydawi (Al-Shihab’s commentary, previous source).

        Sheikh Shaker said : “May God bless Al-Hafiz Ibn Kathir, for he put the truth in its place when he said in the interpretation: As for the one who claims that it indicates knowledge of the support, and that he can extract from that the times of incidents, tribulations, and great battles, he has claimed what he does not have, and has flown in the wrong place!”

        He said : A weak hadith has been reported on this matter, and it is more indicative of the invalidity of this approach than adhering to it as authentic. Then he mentioned the hadith that narrates the aforementioned story, quoting from al-Tabari, and then he said: (This hadith is based on Muhammad ibn al-Sa’ib al-Kalbi, and he is one of those whose only narrations cannot be used as evidence) (Tafsir al-Tabari 1/220).

        However, there are scholars, both ancient and modern, who have refused to delve into the interpretation of these letters, and have preferred what was reported from Abu Bakr al-Siddiq and the rest of the four caliphs: that it is a secret whose knowledge God has kept to Himself. Thus, in their view, it is among the ambiguous verses whose interpretation is known only to God, and for this reason they say about it: God knows best what He intends .

Imam Al-Shawkani denounced in his interpretation those who claimed that they have a definite meaning. He said: “Whoever speaks about explaining the meanings of these letters, asserting that this is what God Almighty intended, has made the worst mistake and has committed the greatest excess in his understanding and claim.”

        If his interpretation of it as he did is based on the language of the Arabs and their sciences, then it is a complete lie, because the Arabs did not speak of any of that. . . Then there remains only one of two matters: The first: Interpretation by pure opinion, which has been forbidden and threatened, and the people of knowledge are the people most deserving of avoiding it, turning away from it, and turning away from its path. They are more pious to Allah, the Exalted, than to make the Book of Allah, the Exalted, a plaything for them to play with, and to place the foolishness of their views and the superstitions of their thoughts upon it. The second: Stopping from the owner of the law and the straight path. . . So whoever finds something of this, then he is not to be blamed for speaking with his full mouth, and speaking according to what his knowledge has reached. And whoever does not hear anything of that, then let him say: I do not know. Or: Allah knows best what he means. . . (Fath al-Qadir 1/30, 31).

        Then he said: (If you say: Is there anything proven from the Messenger of God regarding these openings that is suitable to adhere to? Al-Shawkani said: I do not know that the Messenger of God - may God bless him and grant him peace - spoke about any of their meanings) (Fath al-Qadir 1/31, 32)

Al-Shawkani asked: Is it permissible to imitate one of the Companions in interpreting these opening verses if the statement is authentically attributed to him?

        He answered in the negative, because it is merely his opinion that he expressed based on his own efforts. Moreover, what was narrated from the Companions here is different and contradictory. If we acted upon what one of them said without the other, it would be an arbitrary decision that has no basis. If we acted upon all of them, it would be acting upon what is different and contradictory, and it is not permissible.

However, if anything they said had been taken from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, they would have agreed upon it and not differed, like everything else that was taken from him. . . Then if they had had something like this, they would not have stopped narrating it from him and attributing it to him, especially when they differed. )) End of the words of Sheikh Al-Qaradawi.

        The verse does not contain anything that indicates, directly or indirectly, the lying boy, the subject of his caliphate, or the group of fools whom he fooled, who believed him and called for his prophethood!

God Almighty says:

(( Allah has promised those among you who believe and do righteous deeds that He will surely make them successors upon the earth, just as He made those before them successors, and that He will surely establish for them their religion which He has approved for them, and that He will surely substitute for them, after their fear, security, [they] worship Me, not associating anything with Me. But whoever disbelieves after that - then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient. )) (An-Nur: 55)

This is the verse and it has nothing to do with the lying Qadiani. Rather, we can place the disbelieving Qadiani within the words of God Almighty in the same verse: ((And whoever disbelieves after that - then it is those who are the wicked.))

I think it is time for the boy's followers to stop their ridiculous nonsense that makes people laugh at them .

        None of the ancient or modern interpreters used the abjad calculation at all in interpreting the verses of the Holy Qur’an, except those who slander God, such as the lying Qadiani and Rashad Khalifa!