Circumcision between Paul and the World Health Organization and the rule of the interest of the human race.

 I am still amazed how Paul made the eternal covenant not eternal.

The text in the Old Testament is clear from God to Abraham that circumcision will be an eternal covenant....
and I underline the word: eternal a million times.....

and the problem is that the interpretation trick that Christians believed made the eternal not eternal!!!!

Spiritual symbols intervene to change whatever they want.....

and we all know the truth of Paul which he declared himself that he is ready to be a Jew with the Jew and a pagan with the pagan.... to win everyone.... this is his statement itself in a clear text in the New Testament!

Paul who came to liberate people from the law.....
and described God's law as a curse.....
found that circumcision, which is one of the articles of the true law, stands as an obstacle to winning the pagan nations.... so he abolished it.....
but he was smart.... so he made whoever wanted to apply the law accountable for it with all its details and images that it is difficult to apply.
While he made liberation from it through faith in Jesus as the crucified Lord and Redeemer.... something that Jesus himself brought....

and thus at the hands of Paul was liberation from the law and redemption for Adam's first sin!!!!

Now.....
Our question regarding the title of this post.....

Does religion serve the interests and safety of humans or against their interests and safety.....

God, when He made circumcision an eternal covenant..... It is not a symbol as Paul says.... It aims to protect people also from what science might reveal in the event of non-adherence to this divine law.

Here is this report published in February 2007 which explains that male circumcision protects against AIDS:


Geneva - The World Health Organization and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) welcomed yesterday a new study that proved that male circumcision may provide an effective means of preventing infection with the acquired immunodeficiency virus (AIDS).
This welcome comes after the British medical journal The Lancet published yesterday the results of two experiments conducted in Kenya and Uganda in this regard. These two experiments support a previous study conducted by the Orange Farm Experimental Center in South Africa. The three studies represent evidence of a 50% or 60% reduction in the probability of circumcised men contracting the virus through sexual practices.
The WHO Secretariat and the UNAIDS Programme are scheduled to hold consultations soon to assess the implications of these results and determine a future policy on how to promote and implement male circumcision in the best possible way.



Now....
to all believers that it is not Paul the Apostle who speaks, but the Spirit of God in him.

Can the Spirit of God, after the facts that have proven the effectiveness of circumcision, say on the tongue of Paul:

Galatians 6/15 (Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision benefits a person at all).

Galatians 5/2: (I, Paul, say to you, if you are circumcised, Christ is of no use to you).

Look at how he promotes his own Christ, who was crucified and crushed and died cursed on the cross.

Either you get circumcised and discover that circumcision protects a person from filth and diseases and other safety, cleanliness and health.
All of this is of no benefit from Christ.

Or if you do not get circumcised, you will lose cleanliness, health and safety when you go away believing in Christ as Paul wants.

By God, can the Spirit of God that spoke through Paul say: I, Paul, say to you?!!!!
It is supposed that the Spirit of God who speaks through him.

But he said that whoever says that Christ is cursed does not speak from the Spirit of God, and he himself said: Christ became a curse for us!

How far is this speech?

When God decreed the covenant of circumcision, the law was inspired by His knowledge of what is good for man....
The evidence is what science reveals to us from God decreeing for us what benefits us and provides us with safety, health and cleanliness.

So who is this Paul who reduced the importance of circumcision and even made it unimportant for believers who believe in Paul's Christ in order to win the pagans under his banner so that they would acknowledge him as an apostle who speaks by divine inspiration!

Which do you choose.....
God who instituted circumcision to protect man from things that humans were not yet aware of.
Or Paul's Christ who does not require them to be circumcised, safe, clean and healthy?

Does the Spirit of God cancel and reduce the importance of a law that is in man's interest and provides him with health?


By God, the Jews know everything about the truth.
As evidence that what concerns their safety and health in circumcision and pure foods, they announced and applied it .....
because it is the truth .....
and for this reason we are identical with the Jews in matters of food and circumcision, i.e. what concerns safety and health .....

and there is nothing between our time and their time except Paul and his teachings (which are not the teachings of our Master Christ, peace be upon him) .....
who wanted to win the pagans to make him a spiritual leader .....
wake up, Christians .... the matter is clear to those with minds .....

what makes the Prophet Muhammad testify to circumcision like the Jews while it would have been easier to win the polytheists without circumcision ..... except that it is the truth entrusted to him by the Lord of the Worlds.

As for Paul, he threw away circumcision so that it would not be an obstacle to winning the pagans .... and he declared himself a caller to liberation from the law .... and even made the law a curse that will not be removed except by those who believe in his crushed redeemer Christ .....

and Christ, peace be upon him, is innocent of it and his teachings ....
especially since most of the Christians' doctrine begins after Christ .....
so people like Paul came to speak and distort, depicting that the end of Christ's existence was in itself a message.
Although Christ preached and preached .... about love, asceticism and altruism ..... and told them how to gain eternal life .....
and how it is better for anyone who looks with his eye at something that is contrary to the law to have his entire eye plucked out than to have the body of the one who violates the law thrown into the fire of hell .....
these are the teachings of the true Christ .....
Christ did not say that the law is a curse .... but rather emphasized it ....

but Paul succeeded in killing the teachings of Christ by promoting another Christ ..... and here is the result .....
followers who call themselves Christians .....
and forums that promote the teachings of Paul .....
hypostases, redemption and incarnation .....
so let them search the books ....
to discover the greatest delusion .....

and let them ask the World Health Organization about circumcision, and compare Paul's evaluation of circumcision and his teachings .....

to know where safety and truth lie .....

and let them know that the Prophet Muhammad conveyed the teachings of truth to the pagans despite their difficulty because they are in their interest and God's law.

While Paul was lenient with the pagans to win them over, and even made circumcision useless...


Think, you people of understanding...

I pray for you to be guided from the error of non-safety...