Shroud of Turin Lie

 #Shroud_Lie_of_Turin

"Christians use the Shroud of Turin as evidence of the crucifixion of Jesus"

as it embodies the true image of Jesus after he was crucified.
There is a debate between accepting and rejecting the Shroud of Turin and saying that it is a Vatican hoax
. A scientific study was issued the day before yesterday announcing that the Shroud of Turin is a Christian lie to the common people and a distortion of the acceptance of the church belief and support for the doctrine of the Jesuit crucifixion. It said that belief in it is an illusion and fantasy.
_The Shroud of Turin"
_The study was conducted by forensic scientists and chemists.
Source:
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Live Science website
MailOnline newspaper
, Buzzfeed news
, and Express News

Dr. Matteo Borrini, a forensic scientist at Liverpool John Moores University
Dr. Borrini is a long standing scientific consultant of the Italian sceptic society, the Committee for the Investigation of Claims of the Pseudosciences. A bloodstain pattern expert, Jonathyn Priest of Bevel, Gardner and Associates Inc, Oklahoma, told Buzzfeed that the scientific approach and methodology of
the
tests was 'sound'.



Their investigation
used modern
forensic techniques on


the shroud, focusing on the bloodstains from the supposed crucifixion wounds on the linen, as well as from the spear wound in Jesus' side , as well as
simulating blood flow Their investigation used modern forensic techniques on the shroud, focusing on bloodstains from the supposed crucifixion wounds on the linen, as well as from the spear wound in Jesus' side, and simulating blood flow using a mannequin . ____________ 2_Radiocarbon
















1_with radiocarbon dating determining its origin to be between 1260 and 1390. Independent
tests in 1988 at the University of Oxford, the University of Arizona, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology concluded with 95% confidence that the shroud material dated to 1260–1390 Contributing scientists Damon, PE; Donahue, DJ; Gore, BH ; Hatheway, AL; Jull, AJT; Linick, TW; Sercel, PJ; Toolin, LJ; Bronk, CR; Hall, ET; Hedges, REM; Housley, R.; Law, IA; Perry, C.; Bonani, G.; Trumbore, S.; Woelfli, W.; Ambers, JC; Bowman, SGE; Leese, MN; Tite, M. S. (16 February 1989). "Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin". Nature. 337 (6208): 611–615. doi:10.1038/337611a0. Retrieved 31 July 2016. Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "The Holy Shroud (of Turin)". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. news.nationalgeographic.com Why Shroud of Turin's Secrets Continue to Elude Science, 17 April 2015 Independent tests in 1988 at the University of Oxford, the University of Arizona, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology concluded with 95% confidence that the Shroud material dates from 1260–1390. However, all of the scientific hypotheses used to challenge radiocarbon dating have been scientifically disproven including the medieval Reformation hypothesis, the biocontamination hypothesis, and the carbon monoxide hypothesis. 3_“Testimony of the Custodian of the Shroud 2_the Curia of Turin that Cardinal Anastasio Ballestrero, custodian of the Shroud at the time, sent to his scientific advisor, the engineer Luigi Gonella, with whom he firmly supported that in the matter of carbon dating 14 there had been the hand of Freemasonry who wanted at all costs to prove that the Shroud was from the Middle Ages.” Cardinal Anastasio Balestrero, the custodian of the Shroud at the time, wrote to his scientific advisor, engineer Luigi Gonnella, who strongly supported him on the matter of carbon dating. “There was a Masonic hand that wanted at all costs to prove that the Shroud was medieval.” (The accusation against Freemasonry to escape science “Radiocarbon dating followed the Masons”) Pope Francis appeared to have emphasized the symbolic significance of the Shroud rather than its physical representation of Jesus. 3_What they found, however, was that the bloodstains were not consistent with any one pose in particular. This suggested that someone who had been standing was used to imprint the famous patterns at different angles for the hands, chest and back, according to Buzzfeed. Dr Borrini explained that if it had been a death shroud of an executed person, hung on a cross, or pulled down from one for burial, bloodstains on the cloth ‘shouldn’t be so inconsistent’. 4_Result of Matthew Borrini’s research



















What they found was that the bloodstains were not consistent with any particular stain.
This suggests that someone standing up was using it to cast the famous patterns at different angles on the hands, chest and back.
Dr Borrini explained that if the shroud was for someone who had been executed, hung on a cross, or pulled from someone for burial, the bloodstains on the cloth should not be “inconsistent”.
4_He pointed out that where the shroud showed blood patterns at wrist level these would ‘more than likely’ have come from a source other than small veins and arteries in the hands – which possibly meant the heart was still beating when created.
The revelations came about one year after other experts said the Shroud of Turin was stained with the blood of a torture victim, supporting claims it was used to bury Jesus.
He pointed out that where the shroud showed blood patterns at wrist level, these ‘more than likely’ had come from a source other than small veins and arteries in the hands – which possibly meant the heart was still beating when created. 5_The Bloodstains On The Shroud Of Turin Are Probably Fake,
Say Forensic Experts “This
is just not what happens to a person on a cross ,” said a forensic investigator. 6_. The researchers concluded that the linen appears patched with bloodstains from a standing model, not a crucified man or facedown corpse, adding to evidence that the shroud is a medieval fraud. Even a crucified or hanging person should leave a distinct blood pattern on the cloth . The researchers concluded that the linen appeared to be stained with blood from a standing model, not a crucified man or a corpse with a front, adding to the evidence that the shroud is a medieval hoax. Even a crucified or hung person should have left a distinctive blood pattern on the cloth . _6_The statements of other scientists Physics and the formation of images of the shroud












Some proponents have argued that the image on the shroud can be explained with scientific evidence that supports the Gospel narrative. John Jackson (a member of STURP) proposed that the image was formed by radiation methods beyond the understanding of current science, in particular via the "collapsing cloth" onto a body that was radiating energy at the moment of resurrection. However, STURP member Alan Adler has stated that Jackson's theory is not generally accepted as scientific, given that it runs counter to the laws of physics. In 1989 physicist Thomas Phillips speculated that the Shroud image was formed by neutron radiation due to a miraculous bodily resurrection.
Some proponents have argued that the image on the Shroud can be explained with scientific evidence that supports the Gospel narrative. John Jackson (STURP member) suggested that the image was formed by radiation methods beyond the understanding of current science
(((( There is no problem understanding anything, the important thing is that the image was formed by something beyond science to this day))

specifically by the "collapsing cloth" on the body that was radiating energy at the moment of resurrection. However, STURP member Alan Adler stated that Jackson's theory is not generally accepted as scientific
since it contradicts the laws of physics. In 1989, physicist Thomas Phillips speculated that the image of the shroud was formed by neutron radiation due to a supernatural physical resurrection. ((This is a physicist who says no to science and hello to supernatural power))

Source
The Shroud of Turin by Bernard Ruffin 1999 ISBN , pp. 155-156
Phillips, Thomas J. (16 February 1989). "Shroud irradiated with neutrons?". Nature. 337
_John Paul II said in 2000 that
"the shroud is an image of love God as well as human sin, the imprint left by the tortured body of the crucified, which bears witness to the immense human capacity to cause pain and death to a single person, stands as an icon of the suffering of the innocent in every age
7_Textile experts_according
to the appraisal of Gilbert Raes of the Ghent Institute of Textile Technology in Belgium. Flury-Lemberg stated: "The linen cloth of the Shroud of Turin does not

display any weaving or sewing techniques which would speak against its origin as a high-quality product of the textile workers of the first century." Secrets of
the Dead: Shroud of Christ? PBS.org. Retrieved 28 July 2010 .
8- The type of the 5 red blood spots on the shroud
McCrone (see painting hypothesis) identified these as containing iron oxide, theorizing that its presence was likely due to simple pigment materials used in medieval times. Other researchers, including Alan Adler,The reddish stains were identified as blood and the iron oxide was interpreted as a natural residue of hemoglobin.
Working independently, forensic pathologist Pier Luigi Baima Bollone concurred with Heller and Adler's findings and identified the blood as the AB blood group
McCrone Research, Initial Examination - 1979, retrieved 16 June 2013.

P. L. Baima Bollone, "Indagini identificative su fili della Sindone", Giornale della Accademia di Medicina di Torino, n° 1-12, 1982, pp. 228–239.
McCrone (see drawing hypothesis) identified these as containing iron oxide, suggesting that their presence was likely due to simple dyes used in the Middle Ages. Other researchers, including Alan Adler, identified the reddish spots as blood, and interpreted the iron oxide as a natural residue of hemoglobin.

Working independently, forensic pathologist Pier Luigi Baima Bollone agreed with Heller and Adler's findings and defined the blood as a blood
group
. photographs, and that people familiar with these techniques would have been able to produce an image as found on the shroud. To demonstrate this, he successfully produced photographic images similar to the shroud using only techniques and materials available at the time the shroud was supposedly made. He described his results in his PhD thesis, in papers published in several science journals, and in a book. Silver bromide is believed by some to have been used for making the Shroud of Turin as it is widely used in photographic
Nicholas PL Allen, Verification of the Nature and Causes of the Photo-negative Images on the Shroud of Lirey-Chambéry-Turin
Allen, Nicholas PL (1993) The methods and techniques employed in the manufacture of the Shroud of Turin. https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/…/Allen_Nicholas_P_L_1993.… According to the art historian Nicholas Allen, the image on the Shroud was formed by photographic technology in the thirteenth century. Allen emphasizes that techniques already available before the fourteenth century—for example, as described in the Book of Optics, which was at that time translated from Arabic into Latin—were sufficient to produce primitive images, and that people familiar with these techniques would have been able to produce an image as found on the Shroud. To illustrate this, he succeeded in producing photographs resembling the Shroud using techniques and materials available only at the time the Shroud was intended to be made. He described his findings in his doctoral thesis, in papers published in several scientific journals, and in a book. Some believe that silver bromide was used in the making of the Shroud of Turin because it is widely used in photographic film.


The technique used to produce the image is, according to Walter McCrone, described in a book about medieval painting published in 1847 by Charles Lock Eastlake (Methods and Materials of Painting of the Great Schools and Masters). Eastlake describes in the chapter "Practice of Painting Generally During the XIVth Century" a special technique of painting on linen using tempera paint, which produces images with unusual transparent features—which McCrone compares to the image on the shroud Walter C. McCrone, Judgment day for the Shroud of Turin, Amherst
, NY, Prometheus Books, (1999) ISBN 1-57392-679-5
Eastlake describes in his chapter “The Practice of Painting in General During the Fourteenth Century” a special technique for painting on linen using tempera paint, which produces images with unusual transparent features - which McCrone compares to the image on the Shroud
https://www.google.com/url… https://www.google.com/url… https://www.google.com/url… https://www.google.com/url… https://www.google.com/url… https://www.google.com/url… The bottom line is that all this evidence should pass through your mind and be neutral, you who have been deceived and told that Jesus is God and was crucified for your sake and have presented every deception, distortion and falsification of the facts to make you bow down to a man who did not own anything for himself or for you. Free your mind from a false ecclesiastical heritage that has led you not to search for the truth and its references and to achieve everything that distances you from the belief in the hypostasis. I hope you read more about the truth of this lie that they have portrayed to you as The truth is that her deception was declared and this is done all the time by fair-minded scholars who are not Muslims so that you do not doubt their words. Free your mind and do not worship “the image of an American actor” as the churches and everyone else circulate. It is an instillation in your mind that it is the image of God Almighty, glory be to Him above what they depict, represent and liken Him to, far above. We ask God for guidance for everyone.

Advanced science in the West always exposes the lies invented by the popes there.
The question for you, respected and wise Christian, is why do we find that your religious people lie to deceive their followers??!!
Was this religion founded on a big lie that needs other lies every now and then to support it so that you remain in deception and illusion?
Do religious people who are more religious than you really lie as a result of following the sayings and teachings of Paul, where he says:
(Romans 3:7) “For if the truth of God has increased through my lie to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner? ”
Do you still think that Jesus Christ is God??
Try to make sure because suspicion will not replace the truth.. The issue is really serious because it is eternal life, either bliss and a kingdom or hell and destruction. And that eternal life is what Jesus Christ himself says about it in: -
(John 17:3) "And this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent."
And these are some of the most powerful sentences that speak the truth on the tongue of Jesus Christ, peace and blessings be upon him and our Prophet,
and they are truly
the decisive factor, eternal life (what does it mean, eternal bliss or eternal hell.. Think with me, our guest, how can bliss be eternal and hell be eternal.. Are death and annihilation eternal hell?? Of course not... Do you want Discussion and proof, please, we are with you, we welcome you, so come forward for the dialogue)
that they may know you, the true God (about whom is he talking??!! Is he talking about himself??!! He is talking about the Lord God the Father in heaven. Note that I say about whom he is talking and not with whom he is talking. I was discussing with someone regarding another text and he told me that he was talking to himself, but here I am asking about whom he is talking?? And he says that he is the true God, and why did he confirm it with the truth?? Is there anyone who thought that he was a god, so he denied that about himself and confirmed that the Lord God is the true God?? )
Alone (Oh, he said alone, he unifies the Lord God.. He says that the true God is one and not a trinity, he said one.. only one)
and Jesus Christ whom you sent (Jesus Christ whom you sent, I sent him, this means that he acknowledges that he is a messenger and that the Lord God is one.. Glory be to God, so why do you stubbornly and obstinately say three.. Stop, it is better for you, for all good is in monotheism, the Lord God is one and the Lord Christ, peace and blessings be upon him and our Prophet, is his Messenger)
and the answer comes quickly, as the Lord Christ, peace and blessings be upon him and our Prophet, says
(Matthew 15:9) “And in vain they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men”
and in vain they worship me (In vain they worship me!!... His worship is in vain.. Oh, this is a clear and explicit text that does not need interpretation, and you are still trying to circumvent it. Why??!!
Haven’t you read about what will happen on the Day of Judgment, where Jesus Christ, peace and blessings be upon him and our Prophet, confirms the punishment of those who worship him in vain, that they are the doers of sin, where he said:
(Matthew 7:22, 23) “22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord!’Have we not prophesied in Your name, and cast out demons in Your name, and done many mighty works in Your name? 23 Then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you. Depart from Me, you who practice iniquity!'
Oh! People who think they are right say to Him, 'Lord, Lord,' and prophesy in His name and cast out demons in His name. This is what we see happening with pastors in churches, and there are videos of him... etc.
And in the end He says to them, '
I never knew you. Depart from Me, you who practice iniquity!'
By God, we want the best for you... as we wish it for ourselves. This is our duty towards you.

(The news is documented on
Sky News Arabia, Reuters, and Youm7.

Type in the search engine “Shroud of Turin.”)