Defending the Mother of the Believers Aisha from all deviants , 10 doubts cleared
Refuting the Christians’ doubts about the Lady of the Believers, may God be pleased with her.
The first doubt
: They said: We read in the books of Sunnah many hadiths narrated by Lady Aisha that deal with matters of menstruation and other matters of women. For example:
(Abu al-Nu’man told us, he said: Abdul Wahid told us, he said: Al-Shaibani told us, he said: Abdullah bin Shaddad told us, he said: I heard Maymunah say: When the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, wanted to have intercourse with one of his wives, he would order her to put on a belt while she was menstruating.)
Sahih al-Bukhari, Book of Menstruation, Chapter on having intercourse with a menstruating
woman (Yahya bin Yahya, Abu Bakr bin Abi Shaybah, and Abu Kurayb told us. Yahya said: We were informed, and the other two said: Abu Mu’awiyah told us, on the authority of al-A’mash, on the authority of Ibrahim, on the authority of al-Aswad and Alqamah, on the authority of…) Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, narrated to us: Shuja’ ibn Mukhallad narrated to us: Yahya ibn Abi Za’idah narrated to us: Al-A’mash narrated to us: Muslim narrated to us: Masruq narrated to us: Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, said:
The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, used to kiss while he was fasting and have intercourse while he was fasting, but he was more able to control his desires than you.
Sahih Muslim, Book of Fasting, Chapter on the statement that kissing during fasting is not forbidden for one who is not aroused
. Adam ibn Abi Iyas narrated to us: Ibn Abi Tha’lab narrated to us: Al-Zuhri narrated to us: Urwah narrated to us: Aisha said:
The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and I used to perform ablution from one vessel of a cup called Al-Farq.
Narrated by Al-Bukhari, Book of Ablution
. They said that these hadiths and Its similarities contradict what Ahmad narrated in his Musnad. He said:
“Abdul Samad told us, Hafs Al-Siraj told us, I heard Shahr say, Asma’ bint Yazid told me that she was with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and the men and women were sitting with him. He said, ‘Perhaps a man will say what he does to his family, and perhaps a woman will tell what she did with her husband. So throw it at the people.’ I said, ‘Yes, by Allah, O Messenger of Allah, they say and they do.’ He said, ‘Do not do it, for that is like the devil who met a female devil on the road and had intercourse with her while the people were looking on.’”
The guidance, with Allah’s help, is:
A- The hadith that forbids a woman from telling people what happens between her and her husband is established in the Sharia for the nation, and it is what is consistent with good manners and modesty, especially since people talk about these things in vain and in vain. However, homes are sacred and it is not permissible to talk about what happens between spouses to anyone.
However, all of the above has no relation to the hadiths of the Mother of the Believers. Aisha, since the situation with (the Mothers of the Believers) is different and their life with the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) is not a personal matter that cannot be narrated, but rather it is from the core of the religion that did not leave anything small or big without addressing it. The Mothers of the Believers used to transmit the law of Allah that they received from the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) regarding how a man should treat his wife in various circumstances, the manner of his fasting and standing in prayer, and all matters of his practical life inside his home...etc.
These hadiths that the objector mentioned included abundant knowledge and much goodness, and the righteous Companions and Followers used to travel to the Mothers of the Believers to learn their religion, and none of them looked at this with this sick, hateful view that semi-illiterates come out to us with!
The Mothers of the Believers transmitted their religion to the sons of the nation as Allah and His Messenger commanded them. Allah the Almighty said:And remember what is recited in your houses of the verses of God and wisdom. Indeed, God is Kind and Aware. So the verses of God are the Qur’an, and wisdom is the honorable prophetic Sunnah
. So what the Mother of the Believers Aisha narrated was religion and education, not idle talk!
The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, took it upon himself to guide the mothers of the believers to this important task...
Let us read, for example, what Muslim narrated on the authority of Umar ibn Abi Salamah, the foster son of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, that he “asked the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, if a fasting person kisses his wife? He said: ‘Ask this one (meaning Umm Salamah, his mother),’ and she told him that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, does that. He said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, Allah has forgiven you your past and future sins.’ He said: ‘By Allah, I am the most pious and fearful of Allah among you.’” So
the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, guided Umar in this regard to take the answer to his question from his mother, Umm Salamah.
Likewise, what Muslim mentioned in his Sahih on the authority of Aisha, the wife of the Prophet, who said that a man asked the Messenger of Allah about a man who has intercourse with his wife and then becomes lazy, does he have to perform ghusl while Aisha is sitting? The Messenger of Allah,
may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: ‘I do that, I and this one, then we perform ghusl.’ So the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, informed the man of what he had to do based on what he knew of the actions of the Messenger of Allah and his Sunnah with his family
The second doubt:
An objector said: “We ask about the Battle of the Camel, which was ignited by the Mother of the Believers Aisha, since she was the one who led it herself. How could the Mother of the Believers Aisha leave her home, which God commanded her to stay in, as He, the Most High, said: {And abide in your houses and do not display yourselves like that of the times of the former ignorance.} We ask by what right did the Mother of the Believers permit fighting the Caliph of the Muslims, Ali ibn Abi Talib, who is the guardian of every believing man and woman...
.
His answer:
His saying that she ignited the fire of the Battle of the Camel and led it herself. This is one of the most obvious lies, the corruption of which is known to everyone who has knowledge of history and the events of the Battle of the Camel. This battle did not take place through the planning of any of the Companions, neither Ali nor Talhah nor al-Zubayr nor Aisha. Rather, it took place without their choice or will. Rather, the war broke out between them because the killers of Uthman saw that the Companions - may God be pleased with them - were close to making peace, as historians have reported and scholars who have investigated the sedition and its events have stated.
Al-Baqillani says: “A group of scholars said that the battle in Basra between them was without a determination to fight, but rather suddenly, and in order to repel each of the two parties from themselves because they thought that the other party had betrayed them, because the matter had been settled between them and the peace and separation had been completed with satisfaction. So the killers of Uthman feared that they would be able to overpower them and surround them, so they gathered and consulted and differed, then their opinions agreed that they would separate and start the war at dawn.” The two armies would mix and the group in Ali’s army would shout: “Talha and al-Zubayr have betrayed us.” The other group in Talha and al-Zubayr’s army would shout: “Ali has betrayed us.” So they did what they had planned, and war broke out. Each group of them was defending itself from something bad and preventing its blood from being shed. This was correct from both groups and obedience to God Almighty if it happened. Their abstention from this path is correct and well-known, and we tend towards it and say it.
Ibn al-Arabi says: “Ali came to Basra and they approached each other to show off, but the people of whims did not leave them alone. They hastened to shed blood, and war broke out between them, and the mob increased in number due to profanity. All of this was so that no proof could be found, and the situation did not stop at a statement, and the killers of Uthman were hidden. If one person in the army spoils his plan, how about a thousand?” (
Ibn Hazm says: “As for the Mother of the Believers, al-Zubayr, and Talhah - may God be pleased with them - and those who were with them, they never invalidated the Imamate of Ali nor did they criticize it... It has been proven with a necessary certainty, without any doubt, that they did not go to Basra to fight Ali, nor to disagree with him, nor to break his pledge of allegiance... The proof of that is that they gathered and did not fight or war. When night fell, the killers of Uthman knew that the plot and conspiracy were against them, so they attacked the army of Talhah and al-Zubayr, and drew their swords against them. The people defended themselves, but they were deterred until they mixed with the army of Ali, and his family defended themselves, and each group thought and did not doubt that the other “ I started it with fighting, but the matter became so mixed that no one was able to do more than defend himself, and the corrupt ones among the killers of Uthman, may God curse them, did not stop starting and igniting war.”
Ibn Kathir says, describing the night on which the two groups of companions came to an agreement: “The people spent the best night, and the killers of Uthman spent the worst night. They spent the night consulting each other, and they agreed to incite war at dawn.”
Ibn Abi al-Izz al-Hanafi says: “The Battle of the Camel broke out without the choice of Ali, Talha, and al-Zubayr, but rather the corrupt ones incited it without
These are all the statements of the investigating scholars that agree that the war on the Day of the Camel arose without the intention or choice of the Companions. Rather, they were averse to it, preferring peace to war. None of the Companions had any role in its outbreak or effort to incite it, neither Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) as this Rafidi claimed, nor anyone else. Rather, its embers and fire were kindled by the predecessors of this spiteful Rafidi, and others among the killers of Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him). Today, he accuses the Mother of the Believers of that. So upon them from Allah is what they deserve. How severe is the affliction of the nation with them, and how great is their crime against it in the past and present.
As for his saying: She left her house, and God had commanded her to remain in it in His Most High’s saying: {And abide in your houses and do not display yourselves like that of the times of the former ignorance} (2),
the response to that is: Aisha - may God be pleased with her - only went out to reconcile between the Muslims, and to unite their word, and because she hoped that God would remove the dispute between the Muslims because of her status with them, and this was not her opinion alone,
rather it was the opinion of some of the Companions who were around her and who advised her to do so.
Ibn al-Arabi says: “As for her going out to the Battle of the Camel, she did not go out to fight, but people were attached to her and complained to her about the great strife and conflict they had become, and they hoped for her blessing in reform and hoped to be ashamed of her if she stood up for the people, and she thought that, so she went out following God’s example in His saying: {There is no good in most of their private conversations, except for those who enjoin charity or righteousness or conciliation between people} (1) and in His saying: {And if two parties among the believers should fight, then make peace between them} (2). The command to make peace is addressed to all people, male or female, free or slave...” (3).
Aisha herself stated that this was the reason for her going out, as was proven from her on more than one occasion and in more than one narration.
Al-Tabari narrated that Uthman bin Hanif - may God be pleased with him - who was the governor of Basra on behalf of Ali bin Abi Talib, sent someone to Aisha - may God be pleased with her - when she arrived in Basra to ask her about the reason for her arrival. She said: (By God, someone like me does not go about concealing matters, nor does he cover up the news for his children. The mob from the people of the cities and the conflict of the tribes invaded the sanctuary of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, and innovated in it, and sheltered in it the innovators, and deserved in it the curse of God and the curse of His Messenger, in addition to what they achieved in killing the Imam of the Muslims without remorse or excuse. They made permissible the forbidden blood and shed it, and plundered the forbidden money, and made the sacred city and the sacred month permissible, and tore apart the honor and skins, and resided in the home of a people who hated their residence, causing harm and causing harm, and not benefiting or fearing God, and they were not able to resist nor feel safe. So I went out among the Muslims to inform them of what these people had done and what the people behind us were doing, and what they should do. They came to reform this, and I read: {There is no good in much of their secret conversation, except for those who enjoin charity or righteousness or conciliation between people}. So he rose to reform those whom Allah the Almighty and the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, commanded, young and old, male and female. This is our affair, to the good we command you to do and urge you to do, and the evil we forbid you from and urge you to change.
Ibn Hibban narrated that Aisha - may Allah be pleased with her - wrote to Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, the governor of Ali in Kufa: (For what happened from the killing of Uthman happened as you know, and a reconciliation has emerged between the people, so order those before you to stay in their homes and be content with well-being until what they love of the reform of the Muslims comes to them).
And when Ali sent al-Qa'qa' bin Amr to Aisha and those who were with her to ask her about the reason for her coming, al-Qa'qa' entered upon her and greeted her, and said: (O nation, what made you come and what brought you to this town? She said: O my son, reconciliation between the people)
Al-Tabari’s History 4/488, and Ibn Kathir’s Al-Bidayah wa’l-Nihayah 7/248.
After the war ended on the Day of the Camel, Ali came to Aisha - may God be pleased with her - and said to her: “May God forgive you.” She said: “And may you too. I only wanted to make peace.” (
(Ibn Al-Imad narrated it in Shudharat Al-Dhahab 1/42, and Al-Tabari narrated this trace without her saying: (I only wanted to reform) Al-Tabari in his history 4/534)
So it is established that she did not go out except to reform between the Muslims, and this is a journey of obedience that does not contradict what she was commanded to do of not leaving her house, like other journeys in which there is obedience to Allah and His Messenger, such as Hajj and Umrah.
Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah - may Allah have mercy on him - said in response to the Rafidah on this issue: (She - may Allah be pleased with her - did not display herself like the display of the first Jahiliyyah, and the command to stay in the house does not contradict going out for a commanded benefit, as if she went out for Hajj and Umrah, or went out with her husband on his journey, for this verse was revealed during the life of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, traveled with them after that, as he traveled in the Farewell Pilgrimage with Aisha - may Allah be pleased with her - and others, and he sent her with Abd Al-Rahman, her brother, so he put her behind him, and he led her to Umrah from At-Tan’im, and the Farewell Pilgrimage was before The death of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, was less than three months after the revelation of this verse. For this reason, the wives of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, used to perform Hajj as they used to perform Hajj with him during the caliphate of Umar, may God be pleased with him, and others. Umar would delegate their train to Uthman or Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf. If their travel was for a permissible benefit, Aisha believed that this travel was for the benefit of the Muslims, so she interpreted it in that way.” (1)
As for his saying: “She permitted fighting the Caliph of the Muslims...” it has been mentioned that she did not go out for that reason, and she did not want to fight. Al-Zuhri narrated from her that she said after the Battle of the Camel: “I only want my place to be a barrier between the people, and I did not think that there would be fighting between the people. If I had known that, I would never have stood in that place.” [Al-Maghazi by Al-Zuhri, p. 154]
For this reason, she, may God be pleased with her, regretted witnessing the Battle of the Camel after that with great regret, according to what Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated from her that she said: “I wish I were a fresh branch, and did not travel this way.” [Al-Musannaf by Ibn Abi Shaybah, 7/543]
and in Al-Kamil by Ibn It is narrated that she said to Al-Qaqa’ bin Amr: “By God, I wish I had died twenty years before this day.”
Aisha’s position, may God be pleased with her, is the position of Ali, may God be pleased with him, regarding the war after it occurred.
Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated that Ali said on the day of the Battle of the Camel: “O God, this is not what I intended, O God, this is not what I intended.” And it was narrated
from him, may God be pleased with him, that he said: “I wish I had died twenty years before this.”
Thus, it is proven that Aisha, may God be pleased with her, did not intend to fight at first, and she regretted witnessing it after it occurred. If it was a sin, then it is forgiven for her in two ways: by not intending it, and by repenting from it. This is in addition to what is proven that she went out for a good purpose, which is reconciliation between the Muslims, so she is rewarded for her intention and her mistake is forgiven.
And Ali’s position, may God be pleased with him- From the war is evidence that he saw it as a war of sedition, and for this reason he wished that he had not entered it, and that he had died twenty years before it, because of the confusion in matters therein, and because it did not appear to him that there was an apparent right in fighting his opponents on the Day of the Camel, and if he had believed in his opponents what the Rafidah believe in them of disbelief and apostasy from Islam by their war against Ali - may God be pleased with him - then if he had believed this about them, he would not have regretted fighting them with that great regret, and he would have been happy in killing them and fighting them because of what is in that of the glory of Islam and the suppression of its enemies, and because of the great reward in it. And this happened from him after fighting the Khawarij - although he did not believe in their disbelief - except that he was very happy to fight them, and Allah was very happy to kill them when he confirmed their description, which the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) had known, including the presence of Dhu al-Thadiyah among them, as was reported in the two Sahihs.)
And in this is the greatest response to those who attack the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and accuse them of great sins. If they had minds, they would not have deviated from the position of Ali regarding his opponents, who did not accuse them of their religion, nor did he criticize them for anything that these criminal slanderers boast about. Rather, his praise of them was proven, and his description of them as having faith and piety, and his seeking forgiveness for them.
An objector said: “We ask about the Battle of the Camel, which was ignited by the Mother of the Believers Aisha, since she was the one who led it herself. How could the Mother of the Believers Aisha leave her home, which God commanded her to stay in, as He, the Most High, said: {And abide in your houses and do not display yourselves like that of the times of the former ignorance.} We ask by what right did the Mother of the Believers permit fighting the Caliph of the Muslims, Ali ibn Abi Talib, who is the guardian of every believing man and woman...
.
His answer:
His saying that she ignited the fire of the Battle of the Camel and led it herself. This is one of the most obvious lies, the corruption of which is known to everyone who has knowledge of history and the events of the Battle of the Camel. This battle did not take place through the planning of any of the Companions, neither Ali nor Talhah nor al-Zubayr nor Aisha. Rather, it took place without their choice or will. Rather, the war broke out between them because the killers of Uthman saw that the Companions - may God be pleased with them - were close to making peace, as historians have reported and scholars who have investigated the sedition and its events have stated.
Al-Baqillani says: “A group of scholars said that the battle in Basra between them was without a determination to fight, but rather suddenly, and in order to repel each of the two parties from themselves because they thought that the other party had betrayed them, because the matter had been settled between them and the peace and separation had been completed with satisfaction. So the killers of Uthman feared that they would be able to overpower them and surround them, so they gathered and consulted and differed, then their opinions agreed that they would separate and start the war at dawn.” The two armies would mix and the group in Ali’s army would shout: “Talha and al-Zubayr have betrayed us.” The other group in Talha and al-Zubayr’s army would shout: “Ali has betrayed us.” So they did what they had planned, and war broke out. Each group of them was defending itself from something bad and preventing its blood from being shed. This was correct from both groups and obedience to God Almighty if it happened. Their abstention from this path is correct and well-known, and we tend towards it and say it.
Ibn al-Arabi says: “Ali came to Basra and they approached each other to show off, but the people of whims did not leave them alone. They hastened to shed blood, and war broke out between them, and the mob increased in number due to profanity. All of this was so that no proof could be found, and the situation did not stop at a statement, and the killers of Uthman were hidden. If one person in the army spoils his plan, how about a thousand?” (
Ibn Hazm says: “As for the Mother of the Believers, al-Zubayr, and Talhah - may God be pleased with them - and those who were with them, they never invalidated the Imamate of Ali nor did they criticize it... It has been proven with a necessary certainty, without any doubt, that they did not go to Basra to fight Ali, nor to disagree with him, nor to break his pledge of allegiance... The proof of that is that they gathered and did not fight or war. When night fell, the killers of Uthman knew that the plot and conspiracy were against them, so they attacked the army of Talhah and al-Zubayr, and drew their swords against them. The people defended themselves, but they were deterred until they mixed with the army of Ali, and his family defended themselves, and each group thought and did not doubt that the other “ I started it with fighting, but the matter became so mixed that no one was able to do more than defend himself, and the corrupt ones among the killers of Uthman, may God curse them, did not stop starting and igniting war.”
Ibn Kathir says, describing the night on which the two groups of companions came to an agreement: “The people spent the best night, and the killers of Uthman spent the worst night. They spent the night consulting each other, and they agreed to incite war at dawn.”
Ibn Abi al-Izz al-Hanafi says: “The Battle of the Camel broke out without the choice of Ali, Talha, and al-Zubayr, but rather the corrupt ones incited it without
These are all the statements of the investigating scholars that agree that the war on the Day of the Camel arose without the intention or choice of the Companions. Rather, they were averse to it, preferring peace to war. None of the Companions had any role in its outbreak or effort to incite it, neither Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) as this Rafidi claimed, nor anyone else. Rather, its embers and fire were kindled by the predecessors of this spiteful Rafidi, and others among the killers of Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him). Today, he accuses the Mother of the Believers of that. So upon them from Allah is what they deserve. How severe is the affliction of the nation with them, and how great is their crime against it in the past and present.
As for his saying: She left her house, and God had commanded her to remain in it in His Most High’s saying: {And abide in your houses and do not display yourselves like that of the times of the former ignorance} (2),
the response to that is: Aisha - may God be pleased with her - only went out to reconcile between the Muslims, and to unite their word, and because she hoped that God would remove the dispute between the Muslims because of her status with them, and this was not her opinion alone,
rather it was the opinion of some of the Companions who were around her and who advised her to do so.
Ibn al-Arabi says: “As for her going out to the Battle of the Camel, she did not go out to fight, but people were attached to her and complained to her about the great strife and conflict they had become, and they hoped for her blessing in reform and hoped to be ashamed of her if she stood up for the people, and she thought that, so she went out following God’s example in His saying: {There is no good in most of their private conversations, except for those who enjoin charity or righteousness or conciliation between people} (1) and in His saying: {And if two parties among the believers should fight, then make peace between them} (2). The command to make peace is addressed to all people, male or female, free or slave...” (3).
Aisha herself stated that this was the reason for her going out, as was proven from her on more than one occasion and in more than one narration.
Al-Tabari narrated that Uthman bin Hanif - may God be pleased with him - who was the governor of Basra on behalf of Ali bin Abi Talib, sent someone to Aisha - may God be pleased with her - when she arrived in Basra to ask her about the reason for her arrival. She said: (By God, someone like me does not go about concealing matters, nor does he cover up the news for his children. The mob from the people of the cities and the conflict of the tribes invaded the sanctuary of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, and innovated in it, and sheltered in it the innovators, and deserved in it the curse of God and the curse of His Messenger, in addition to what they achieved in killing the Imam of the Muslims without remorse or excuse. They made permissible the forbidden blood and shed it, and plundered the forbidden money, and made the sacred city and the sacred month permissible, and tore apart the honor and skins, and resided in the home of a people who hated their residence, causing harm and causing harm, and not benefiting or fearing God, and they were not able to resist nor feel safe. So I went out among the Muslims to inform them of what these people had done and what the people behind us were doing, and what they should do. They came to reform this, and I read: {There is no good in much of their secret conversation, except for those who enjoin charity or righteousness or conciliation between people}. So he rose to reform those whom Allah the Almighty and the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, commanded, young and old, male and female. This is our affair, to the good we command you to do and urge you to do, and the evil we forbid you from and urge you to change.
Ibn Hibban narrated that Aisha - may Allah be pleased with her - wrote to Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, the governor of Ali in Kufa: (For what happened from the killing of Uthman happened as you know, and a reconciliation has emerged between the people, so order those before you to stay in their homes and be content with well-being until what they love of the reform of the Muslims comes to them).
And when Ali sent al-Qa'qa' bin Amr to Aisha and those who were with her to ask her about the reason for her coming, al-Qa'qa' entered upon her and greeted her, and said: (O nation, what made you come and what brought you to this town? She said: O my son, reconciliation between the people)
Al-Tabari’s History 4/488, and Ibn Kathir’s Al-Bidayah wa’l-Nihayah 7/248.
After the war ended on the Day of the Camel, Ali came to Aisha - may God be pleased with her - and said to her: “May God forgive you.” She said: “And may you too. I only wanted to make peace.” (
(Ibn Al-Imad narrated it in Shudharat Al-Dhahab 1/42, and Al-Tabari narrated this trace without her saying: (I only wanted to reform) Al-Tabari in his history 4/534)
So it is established that she did not go out except to reform between the Muslims, and this is a journey of obedience that does not contradict what she was commanded to do of not leaving her house, like other journeys in which there is obedience to Allah and His Messenger, such as Hajj and Umrah.
Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah - may Allah have mercy on him - said in response to the Rafidah on this issue: (She - may Allah be pleased with her - did not display herself like the display of the first Jahiliyyah, and the command to stay in the house does not contradict going out for a commanded benefit, as if she went out for Hajj and Umrah, or went out with her husband on his journey, for this verse was revealed during the life of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, traveled with them after that, as he traveled in the Farewell Pilgrimage with Aisha - may Allah be pleased with her - and others, and he sent her with Abd Al-Rahman, her brother, so he put her behind him, and he led her to Umrah from At-Tan’im, and the Farewell Pilgrimage was before The death of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, was less than three months after the revelation of this verse. For this reason, the wives of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, used to perform Hajj as they used to perform Hajj with him during the caliphate of Umar, may God be pleased with him, and others. Umar would delegate their train to Uthman or Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf. If their travel was for a permissible benefit, Aisha believed that this travel was for the benefit of the Muslims, so she interpreted it in that way.” (1)
As for his saying: “She permitted fighting the Caliph of the Muslims...” it has been mentioned that she did not go out for that reason, and she did not want to fight. Al-Zuhri narrated from her that she said after the Battle of the Camel: “I only want my place to be a barrier between the people, and I did not think that there would be fighting between the people. If I had known that, I would never have stood in that place.” [Al-Maghazi by Al-Zuhri, p. 154]
For this reason, she, may God be pleased with her, regretted witnessing the Battle of the Camel after that with great regret, according to what Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated from her that she said: “I wish I were a fresh branch, and did not travel this way.” [Al-Musannaf by Ibn Abi Shaybah, 7/543]
and in Al-Kamil by Ibn It is narrated that she said to Al-Qaqa’ bin Amr: “By God, I wish I had died twenty years before this day.”
Aisha’s position, may God be pleased with her, is the position of Ali, may God be pleased with him, regarding the war after it occurred.
Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated that Ali said on the day of the Battle of the Camel: “O God, this is not what I intended, O God, this is not what I intended.” And it was narrated
from him, may God be pleased with him, that he said: “I wish I had died twenty years before this.”
Thus, it is proven that Aisha, may God be pleased with her, did not intend to fight at first, and she regretted witnessing it after it occurred. If it was a sin, then it is forgiven for her in two ways: by not intending it, and by repenting from it. This is in addition to what is proven that she went out for a good purpose, which is reconciliation between the Muslims, so she is rewarded for her intention and her mistake is forgiven.
And Ali’s position, may God be pleased with him- From the war is evidence that he saw it as a war of sedition, and for this reason he wished that he had not entered it, and that he had died twenty years before it, because of the confusion in matters therein, and because it did not appear to him that there was an apparent right in fighting his opponents on the Day of the Camel, and if he had believed in his opponents what the Rafidah believe in them of disbelief and apostasy from Islam by their war against Ali - may God be pleased with him - then if he had believed this about them, he would not have regretted fighting them with that great regret, and he would have been happy in killing them and fighting them because of what is in that of the glory of Islam and the suppression of its enemies, and because of the great reward in it. And this happened from him after fighting the Khawarij - although he did not believe in their disbelief - except that he was very happy to fight them, and Allah was very happy to kill them when he confirmed their description, which the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) had known, including the presence of Dhu al-Thadiyah among them, as was reported in the two Sahihs.)
And in this is the greatest response to those who attack the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and accuse them of great sins. If they had minds, they would not have deviated from the position of Ali regarding his opponents, who did not accuse them of their religion, nor did he criticize them for anything that these criminal slanderers boast about. Rather, his praise of them was proven, and his description of them as having faith and piety, and his seeking forgiveness for them.
The third doubt:
The objector said: Al-Bukhari included in his Sahih from the book of the trials that surge like the waves of the sea, he said: When Talhah, Al-Zubayr and Aisha went to Basra, Ali sent Ammar bin Yasir and Al-Hasan bin Ali, and they came to us in Kufa. They ascended the pulpit, and Al-Hasan bin Ali was on the pulpit at the top, and Ammar stood below Al-Hasan. We gathered around him and I heard Ammar saying: Aisha has gone to Basra, and by God, she is the wife of your Prophet in this world and the hereafter, but God, the Blessed and Exalted, tested you to know whether you obey Him or her.
The answer:
There is nothing in what Ammar said to criticize Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her), rather it contains her greatest virtue, which is that she is the wife of our Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in this world and the Hereafter. What virtue is greater than this, and what honor is higher than this? The ultimate goal of every believer is the pleasure of Allah and Paradise. Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) achieved this with the testimony of Ammar (may Allah be pleased with him), who had a different opinion from her in that trial, and that she will be in the highest ranks in Paradise in the company of her husband, the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), as Ali himself testified to her after the end of the Battle of the Camel, as At-Tabari reported that he came to her and she praised him and he praised her, and among what he said was: (O people, you have spoken the truth and have been righteous... and she is the wife of your Prophet in this world and the Hereafter).
Fourth doubt:
They said: Al-Bukhari also included in the Book of Conditions, Chapter on What Was Said About the Houses of the Wives of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, he said: The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, stood up as a preacher and pointed towards Aisha’s house and said: Here is the temptation, here is the temptation, here is the temptation, from where the horn of Satan rises.... After all this, I wonder how Aisha deserved all this appreciation and respect from the people of the Sunnah and the Community, because she is the wife of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and his wives are many, and among them is one who is better than Aisha, as the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, himself stated.
His answer:
It is not hidden what is in his words of misleading and deception, and reversing the facts and deceiving those who do not have knowledge from the common people, and that is by his interpretation of the narrator’s statement: (He pointed towards Aisha’s house) as meaning that the pointing was to Aisha’s house and that it was the cause of the temptation, and the hadith does not indicate this in any way, and this phrase does not bear this understanding for anyone who has the slightest knowledge of the objectives of speech.
The narrator said: ( He pointed towards Aisha’s dwelling ) , meaning towards Aisha’s dwelling, and Aisha’s dwelling - may Allah be pleased with her - was located to the east of the Prophet’s mosque, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so the pointing was towards the dwelling, which is (the east), not towards the dwelling. If the pointing was towards the dwelling, he would have said: ( He pointed towards Aisha’s dwelling ) and not: ( Towards Aisha’s dwelling ) . The difference between the two expressions is clear and obvious.
This narration that he mentioned was included by Al-Bukhari in the Book of the Obligation of the Fifth, in the chapter on what was said about the houses of the wives of the Prophet - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - and it is not as the objector claimed that it is in the Book of Conditions.
This hadith has been included in the books of Sunnah, from the two Sahihs and others, through several chains of narration, and with more than one wording. It is stated explicitly in these narrations that the pointing was towards the east, and the text in them refers to the countries referred to, which refutes the objector’s claim and makes it unnecessary to bother to respond to him with anything else.
Here are some narrations of the hadith through several chains of narration on the authority of Ibn Umar - may Allah be pleased with them both.
On the authority of Laith, on the authority of Nafi’, on the authority of Ibn Umar - may Allah be pleased with them both - that he heard the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, while facing the east say: ( Behold, the trial is here, from where the horn of Satan rises ).
Narrated by Al-Bukhari in: (The Book of Tribulations, Chapter: The Prophet’s statement, may Allah bless him and grant him peace
: The trial is from the east), and on the authority of Ubayd ibn Umar, who said: Nafi’ told me, on the authority of Ibn Umar: (The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, stood at the door of Hafsah and pointed with his hand towards the east: The trial is from where the horn of Satan rises. He said it two or three times).
Narrated by Muslim: ( The Book of Tribulations, Chapter: The trial is from the east ...) 4/2229.
And on the authority of Salim ibn Abdullah, on the authority of his father, that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: (While facing the east, behold, the trial is here, behold, the trial is here, behold, the trial is here, from where the horn of Satan rises).
Narrated by Muslim: ( The Book of Tribulations, Chapter: The trial is from the east ...) 4/2229.
These narrations explicitly specify the direction referred to, which is the direction of the East, and they explain what is meant by the reference in the narration mentioned by the objector.
Some other narrations of the hadith also specify the countries referred to.
On the authority of Nafi’ on the authority of Ibn Umar, he said: (The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, mentioned: O God, bless us in our Levant, O God, bless us in our Yemen. They said: O Messenger of God, and in our Najd? I think he said the third time: There are earthquakes and tribulations, and from there the horn of Satan will emerge.) [Narrated by Al-Bukhari]
And on the authority of Salim bin Abdullah bin Omar, he said: O people of Iraq? I do not ask you about the small things and I am riding you to the big ones. I heard Abu Abdullah bin Omar say: I heard the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, say: ( The tribulation will come from here, and he pointed with his hand toward the east, from where the horn of Satan will emerge . ) [Narrated by Muslim] In some narrations, there was mention of some of the tribes who inhabit that country and a description of the state of its people. On the authority of Abu Masoud, he said: (The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, pointed with his hand toward Yemen and said: Behold, faith is here, and hardness and harshness of hearts are in the fiddadin (1) at the bases of the camels’ tails, where the horns of Satan rise in Rabi’ah and Mudar). These narrations clearly indicate what the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, meant by his saying: (The tribulation is here) and that what was meant by that was the countries of the East, as the narrations came explicitly stating this, as some of them described the people of those countries and identified some of their tribes, which shows the invalidity of what the Rafidi claimed that the reference was to the house of Aisha, for this is a false statement and a fallen opinion, which no one understood and no one said except this spiteful Rafidi. What made him do this is his hatred for the Mother of the Believers, Aisha, may God be pleased with her, so he will receive from God what he deserves and God will clothe him with humiliation and disgrace in this world and the hereafter for his slander of the Companions. [Written by His Eminence Sheikh Othman Al-Khamis] Finally, we say regarding the strife that broke out between the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, that this is a strife that the noble Prophet had informed us about… and he, peace be upon him, bore witness that Talhah, Al-Zubayr, Ali, and the Mother of the Believers Aisha would be in Paradise. Allah the Almighty said: “And if two parties among the believers should fight, then make settlement between them. But if one of them oppresses the other, then fight against the one that oppresses until it returns to the command of Allah. But if it returns, then make settlement between them with justice and act equitably. Indeed, Allah loves those who are just.” (9) The believers are but brothers, so make settlement between your brothers, and fear Allah that you may receive mercy.
Thus the verse proves the possibility of fighting between two groups that attribute faith to both of them... All praise
and thanks be to Allah. What is amazing is that we read in the books of the Christians about the occurrence of such seditions and wars between the believers among them, according to their claim, but for despicable and vile reasons... until the kingdom of the Jews - God's chosen people - was divided into the kingdom of Judah and Samaria, and fierce wars broke out between them, and they still disbelieve in each other until Yemen, and the Torah of each of them differs from the other
- and among what we read in the books of the Christians about wars... the war of Saul (the prophet) with David (the prophet) after the former hated him and feared his authority, so he began to pursue him, and the matter ended with the killing of Saul And his son Nathan at the hands of the Philistines (1 Samuel)
- and we read about David’s war against his son and the apple of his eye, Abishalom, so David fought him until he was killed, and with him were killed twenty thousand of the Israelites loyal to him (2 Samuel 18). So who is this prophet who kills his sons and his clan in this way for the sake of the king, I wonder?
- We also read about David that he was a highwayman who extorted people.. So he sent to Nabal asking him for a reward in exchange for not robbing him of anything, but the man refused this exploitation, so David brought his soldiers to kill the weak man and killed him
((… When your shepherds were among us, we did not harm them, nor was anything missing from them during the days that they were in Carmel… So give your servants and your son David whatever you wish)) The man replied ((Who is David and who is the son of Jesse? Today the slaves who run away from their masters have multiplied)) So David decided to kill him ((So David’s young men turned and returned to David and told him what Nabal had said. Then David said to his men, “Every one of you gird on his sword.” And he went at the head of four hundred men)) 1 Samuel 27: 7-13
- We also find the story of the believer’s injustice to his believing brother through the Book of Judges, as we read the story of a man from the tribe of Levi who had a concubine (mistress), so she became angry with him one day and took refuge in her family’s house, so he went He appeases her and takes her back to his city. On the way, his servant suggests that they take refuge in the city of the Jebusites to rest. His master says to him: No, we will not enter a strange city where there is not a single Israelite. Let us cross over to Gibeah (Judges 19:12).
((Sheikh hosted them in Gibeah and hosted them in his house. He fed their donkeys, and they washed their feet and ate food and drink.))
The important thing is that the people of the city - the monotheistic Jews - came to besiege the house of Sheikh, demanding that they practice sodomy with his guests
((22 Bring out to us the man you have hosted so that we may have intercourse with him (23). So the owner of the house came out to them and said to them: No, my brothers, do not commit this shameful act. For my guest has entered my house (24). Here is my virgin daughter and his concubine, so let me bring them out to you so that you may enjoy them and do as you please.))
In the end, the man brought out his concubine ((and they continued to take turns raping her all night until the break of day.)) In the end, she died. ((28 So the man loaded her on a donkey and went to where he lived)) Then he got up and took a knife and began to cut his concubine into twelve pieces from her bones and distributed them to all the tribes of the children of Israel!!
This resulted in an internal war between the sons of the monotheists (the Israelites and the Benjaminites, in which forty thousand and sixty Israelites and fifty thousand Benjaminites were killed (48) and the children of Israel returned to the cities of Benjamin and destroyed all its people with the edge of the sword, and slaughtered the animals and everything that was found in it and burned them with fire)) (Judges 20:48)
It is noteworthy that the sin that occurred against the concubine was by the Jews, knowing that her owner refused to enter a non-Jewish land because he believed in the lack of motherhood and security, so the terror was carried out by the hands of his brothers, and is there anything more extreme than raping a woman to death?! And he also incited his people and clan against the rest of the Jews by cutting up the concubine, and thus he responded to the obscene sexual terrorism with a terrorist riot in which 90,060 men were killed, in addition to the destruction of the cities of the Benjamites, and only 600 men remained from the entire tribe ((and six hundred men of them were able to escape)) (Judges 20:47).
And these men after the peace did not find women to marry (Judges 21:16)
, so the solution was to send an army to kill the men and women of (Jabesh Gilead), and the commandment to the army was ((kill every male and every woman with whom any man has slept, and they found among the people of Jabesh Gilead only four hundred virgins with whom no man had slept, and they brought them)) (Judges 21:11, 12),
and two hundred men remained without women, and the solution was to steal and kidnap two hundred women from (Shiloh) during a dancing celebration (Judges 21:20, 21)…
[ Quoted About the book Women between Judaism , Christianity and Islam
Where is this dirty black history in the history of Muslims?!
They said: Al-Bukhari also included in the Book of Conditions, Chapter on What Was Said About the Houses of the Wives of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, he said: The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, stood up as a preacher and pointed towards Aisha’s house and said: Here is the temptation, here is the temptation, here is the temptation, from where the horn of Satan rises.... After all this, I wonder how Aisha deserved all this appreciation and respect from the people of the Sunnah and the Community, because she is the wife of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and his wives are many, and among them is one who is better than Aisha, as the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, himself stated.
His answer:
It is not hidden what is in his words of misleading and deception, and reversing the facts and deceiving those who do not have knowledge from the common people, and that is by his interpretation of the narrator’s statement: (He pointed towards Aisha’s house) as meaning that the pointing was to Aisha’s house and that it was the cause of the temptation, and the hadith does not indicate this in any way, and this phrase does not bear this understanding for anyone who has the slightest knowledge of the objectives of speech.
The narrator said: ( He pointed towards Aisha’s dwelling ) , meaning towards Aisha’s dwelling, and Aisha’s dwelling - may Allah be pleased with her - was located to the east of the Prophet’s mosque, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so the pointing was towards the dwelling, which is (the east), not towards the dwelling. If the pointing was towards the dwelling, he would have said: ( He pointed towards Aisha’s dwelling ) and not: ( Towards Aisha’s dwelling ) . The difference between the two expressions is clear and obvious.
This narration that he mentioned was included by Al-Bukhari in the Book of the Obligation of the Fifth, in the chapter on what was said about the houses of the wives of the Prophet - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - and it is not as the objector claimed that it is in the Book of Conditions.
This hadith has been included in the books of Sunnah, from the two Sahihs and others, through several chains of narration, and with more than one wording. It is stated explicitly in these narrations that the pointing was towards the east, and the text in them refers to the countries referred to, which refutes the objector’s claim and makes it unnecessary to bother to respond to him with anything else.
Here are some narrations of the hadith through several chains of narration on the authority of Ibn Umar - may Allah be pleased with them both.
On the authority of Laith, on the authority of Nafi’, on the authority of Ibn Umar - may Allah be pleased with them both - that he heard the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, while facing the east say: ( Behold, the trial is here, from where the horn of Satan rises ).
Narrated by Al-Bukhari in: (The Book of Tribulations, Chapter: The Prophet’s statement, may Allah bless him and grant him peace
: The trial is from the east), and on the authority of Ubayd ibn Umar, who said: Nafi’ told me, on the authority of Ibn Umar: (The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, stood at the door of Hafsah and pointed with his hand towards the east: The trial is from where the horn of Satan rises. He said it two or three times).
Narrated by Muslim: ( The Book of Tribulations, Chapter: The trial is from the east ...) 4/2229.
And on the authority of Salim ibn Abdullah, on the authority of his father, that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: (While facing the east, behold, the trial is here, behold, the trial is here, behold, the trial is here, from where the horn of Satan rises).
Narrated by Muslim: ( The Book of Tribulations, Chapter: The trial is from the east ...) 4/2229.
These narrations explicitly specify the direction referred to, which is the direction of the East, and they explain what is meant by the reference in the narration mentioned by the objector.
Some other narrations of the hadith also specify the countries referred to.
On the authority of Nafi’ on the authority of Ibn Umar, he said: (The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, mentioned: O God, bless us in our Levant, O God, bless us in our Yemen. They said: O Messenger of God, and in our Najd? I think he said the third time: There are earthquakes and tribulations, and from there the horn of Satan will emerge.) [Narrated by Al-Bukhari]
And on the authority of Salim bin Abdullah bin Omar, he said: O people of Iraq? I do not ask you about the small things and I am riding you to the big ones. I heard Abu Abdullah bin Omar say: I heard the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, say: ( The tribulation will come from here, and he pointed with his hand toward the east, from where the horn of Satan will emerge . ) [Narrated by Muslim] In some narrations, there was mention of some of the tribes who inhabit that country and a description of the state of its people. On the authority of Abu Masoud, he said: (The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, pointed with his hand toward Yemen and said: Behold, faith is here, and hardness and harshness of hearts are in the fiddadin (1) at the bases of the camels’ tails, where the horns of Satan rise in Rabi’ah and Mudar). These narrations clearly indicate what the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, meant by his saying: (The tribulation is here) and that what was meant by that was the countries of the East, as the narrations came explicitly stating this, as some of them described the people of those countries and identified some of their tribes, which shows the invalidity of what the Rafidi claimed that the reference was to the house of Aisha, for this is a false statement and a fallen opinion, which no one understood and no one said except this spiteful Rafidi. What made him do this is his hatred for the Mother of the Believers, Aisha, may God be pleased with her, so he will receive from God what he deserves and God will clothe him with humiliation and disgrace in this world and the hereafter for his slander of the Companions. [Written by His Eminence Sheikh Othman Al-Khamis] Finally, we say regarding the strife that broke out between the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, that this is a strife that the noble Prophet had informed us about… and he, peace be upon him, bore witness that Talhah, Al-Zubayr, Ali, and the Mother of the Believers Aisha would be in Paradise. Allah the Almighty said: “And if two parties among the believers should fight, then make settlement between them. But if one of them oppresses the other, then fight against the one that oppresses until it returns to the command of Allah. But if it returns, then make settlement between them with justice and act equitably. Indeed, Allah loves those who are just.” (9) The believers are but brothers, so make settlement between your brothers, and fear Allah that you may receive mercy.
Thus the verse proves the possibility of fighting between two groups that attribute faith to both of them... All praise
and thanks be to Allah. What is amazing is that we read in the books of the Christians about the occurrence of such seditions and wars between the believers among them, according to their claim, but for despicable and vile reasons... until the kingdom of the Jews - God's chosen people - was divided into the kingdom of Judah and Samaria, and fierce wars broke out between them, and they still disbelieve in each other until Yemen, and the Torah of each of them differs from the other
- and among what we read in the books of the Christians about wars... the war of Saul (the prophet) with David (the prophet) after the former hated him and feared his authority, so he began to pursue him, and the matter ended with the killing of Saul And his son Nathan at the hands of the Philistines (1 Samuel)
- and we read about David’s war against his son and the apple of his eye, Abishalom, so David fought him until he was killed, and with him were killed twenty thousand of the Israelites loyal to him (2 Samuel 18). So who is this prophet who kills his sons and his clan in this way for the sake of the king, I wonder?
- We also read about David that he was a highwayman who extorted people.. So he sent to Nabal asking him for a reward in exchange for not robbing him of anything, but the man refused this exploitation, so David brought his soldiers to kill the weak man and killed him
((… When your shepherds were among us, we did not harm them, nor was anything missing from them during the days that they were in Carmel… So give your servants and your son David whatever you wish)) The man replied ((Who is David and who is the son of Jesse? Today the slaves who run away from their masters have multiplied)) So David decided to kill him ((So David’s young men turned and returned to David and told him what Nabal had said. Then David said to his men, “Every one of you gird on his sword.” And he went at the head of four hundred men)) 1 Samuel 27: 7-13
- We also find the story of the believer’s injustice to his believing brother through the Book of Judges, as we read the story of a man from the tribe of Levi who had a concubine (mistress), so she became angry with him one day and took refuge in her family’s house, so he went He appeases her and takes her back to his city. On the way, his servant suggests that they take refuge in the city of the Jebusites to rest. His master says to him: No, we will not enter a strange city where there is not a single Israelite. Let us cross over to Gibeah (Judges 19:12).
((Sheikh hosted them in Gibeah and hosted them in his house. He fed their donkeys, and they washed their feet and ate food and drink.))
The important thing is that the people of the city - the monotheistic Jews - came to besiege the house of Sheikh, demanding that they practice sodomy with his guests
((22 Bring out to us the man you have hosted so that we may have intercourse with him (23). So the owner of the house came out to them and said to them: No, my brothers, do not commit this shameful act. For my guest has entered my house (24). Here is my virgin daughter and his concubine, so let me bring them out to you so that you may enjoy them and do as you please.))
In the end, the man brought out his concubine ((and they continued to take turns raping her all night until the break of day.)) In the end, she died. ((28 So the man loaded her on a donkey and went to where he lived)) Then he got up and took a knife and began to cut his concubine into twelve pieces from her bones and distributed them to all the tribes of the children of Israel!!
This resulted in an internal war between the sons of the monotheists (the Israelites and the Benjaminites, in which forty thousand and sixty Israelites and fifty thousand Benjaminites were killed (48) and the children of Israel returned to the cities of Benjamin and destroyed all its people with the edge of the sword, and slaughtered the animals and everything that was found in it and burned them with fire)) (Judges 20:48)
It is noteworthy that the sin that occurred against the concubine was by the Jews, knowing that her owner refused to enter a non-Jewish land because he believed in the lack of motherhood and security, so the terror was carried out by the hands of his brothers, and is there anything more extreme than raping a woman to death?! And he also incited his people and clan against the rest of the Jews by cutting up the concubine, and thus he responded to the obscene sexual terrorism with a terrorist riot in which 90,060 men were killed, in addition to the destruction of the cities of the Benjamites, and only 600 men remained from the entire tribe ((and six hundred men of them were able to escape)) (Judges 20:47).
And these men after the peace did not find women to marry (Judges 21:16)
, so the solution was to send an army to kill the men and women of (Jabesh Gilead), and the commandment to the army was ((kill every male and every woman with whom any man has slept, and they found among the people of Jabesh Gilead only four hundred virgins with whom no man had slept, and they brought them)) (Judges 21:11, 12),
and two hundred men remained without women, and the solution was to steal and kidnap two hundred women from (Shiloh) during a dancing celebration (Judges 21:20, 21)…
[ Quoted About the book Women between Judaism , Christianity and Islam
Where is this dirty black history in the history of Muslims?!
The fifth doubt:
The objector said: The Mother of the Believers Aisha brought forbidden musical instruments into the house of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. He provided evidence for that with the hadith narrated by Muslim on the authority of Sayyida Aisha, in which it says: ((Abu Bakr entered upon me and I had with me two slave girls from the slave girls of the Ansar. They were singing what the Ansar had said on the day of Bu’ath. She said: They are not singers. Abu Bakr said: Is it the flute of Satan in the house of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace? And that was on a holiday... the hadith))
The answer:
There is no harm in what Sayyida Aisha did because of her young age at that time on the one hand, and because what Abu Bakr said was an effort on his part,
and the Messenger of Allah permitted what Sayyida Aisha did and explained to Abu Bakr that beating the drums and singing on holidays is permissible for the people of Islam in their homes. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said in the continuation of the hadith : “ O Abu Bakr! Every people have a holiday, and this is our holiday.”
Thus, the doubt is completely eliminated by the grace of Allah Almighty
The sixth doubt:
The objector said:
We read in Bukhari a hadith:
“Abdullah bin Muhammad told us, he said: Abd al-Samad told me, he said: Shu’bah told me, he said: Abu Bakr bin Hafs told me, he said: I heard Abu Salamah say: ‘Aisha’s brother and I entered upon Aisha, and
her brother asked her about the ablution of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. So she called for a vessel about a sa’ and washed herself and poured water over her head, and between us and her was a veil.’”
Narrated by al-Bukhari - Book of Washing - Chapter on Washing with a Sa’ and the like.
They said: How could the Mother of the Believers uncover herself and wash herself in front of strangers in this manner?
The answer, with the help of the Generous King:
The two people present in this hadith were not strangers to the Mother of the Believers, but rather they were her mahrams. The first was her brother, as the narration explicitly stated, and the second was Abu Salamah, who was his foster aunt, breastfed by her sister Umm Kulthum.
As for his statement that she uncovered herself in front of her, it is false, as the hadith stated that there was a veil between the Mother of the Believers and them.
Judge Iyad said: [ Its apparent meaning is that they saw her work on her head and the upper parts of her body, which is permissible for a mahram to look at, because she was Abu Salamah’s foster aunt, breastfed by her sister Umm Kulthum. She only covered the lower parts of her body, which is not permissible for a mahram to look at.
He said: Otherwise, there would be no meaning to her bathing in their presence. And in Aisha’s action there is evidence of the desirability of teaching by action; Because it was more difficult for the soul, and since the question was open to both manner and quantity, it was proven to them that which indicates both matters together: As for manner, it was limited to pouring water, and as for quantity, it was sufficient to use a Saa.]
So may Allah bless the mother of the faithful, the virtuous teacher, who concealed from her mahrams what Christian women do not conceal from strangers in the churches of unbelief.
How could she not, when her modesty reached the point of concealing herself from Umar ibn al-Khattab even after his death, so she said, may Allah be pleased with her:
(I used to enter my house in which the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and his family, was, and I would put on my garment and say, “He is only my husband and my father.” So when Umar was buried with them, by Allah, I did not enter except with my garment tied around me out of modesty before Umar, may Allah be pleased with him.)
*Narrated by al-Hakim in al-Mustadrak, and he said: This is an authentic hadith according to the conditions of the two sheikhs, and they did not include it.*
“Abdullah bin Muhammad told us, he said: Abd al-Samad told me, he said: Shu’bah told me, he said: Abu Bakr bin Hafs told me, he said: I heard Abu Salamah say: ‘Aisha’s brother and I entered upon Aisha, and
her brother asked her about the ablution of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. So she called for a vessel about a sa’ and washed herself and poured water over her head, and between us and her was a veil.’”
Narrated by al-Bukhari - Book of Washing - Chapter on Washing with a Sa’ and the like.
They said: How could the Mother of the Believers uncover herself and wash herself in front of strangers in this manner?
The answer, with the help of the Generous King:
The two people present in this hadith were not strangers to the Mother of the Believers, but rather they were her mahrams. The first was her brother, as the narration explicitly stated, and the second was Abu Salamah, who was his foster aunt, breastfed by her sister Umm Kulthum.
As for his statement that she uncovered herself in front of her, it is false, as the hadith stated that there was a veil between the Mother of the Believers and them.
Judge Iyad said: [ Its apparent meaning is that they saw her work on her head and the upper parts of her body, which is permissible for a mahram to look at, because she was Abu Salamah’s foster aunt, breastfed by her sister Umm Kulthum. She only covered the lower parts of her body, which is not permissible for a mahram to look at.
He said: Otherwise, there would be no meaning to her bathing in their presence. And in Aisha’s action there is evidence of the desirability of teaching by action; Because it was more difficult for the soul, and since the question was open to both manner and quantity, it was proven to them that which indicates both matters together: As for manner, it was limited to pouring water, and as for quantity, it was sufficient to use a Saa.]
So may Allah bless the mother of the faithful, the virtuous teacher, who concealed from her mahrams what Christian women do not conceal from strangers in the churches of unbelief.
How could she not, when her modesty reached the point of concealing herself from Umar ibn al-Khattab even after his death, so she said, may Allah be pleased with her:
(I used to enter my house in which the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and his family, was, and I would put on my garment and say, “He is only my husband and my father.” So when Umar was buried with them, by Allah, I did not enter except with my garment tied around me out of modesty before Umar, may Allah be pleased with him.)
*Narrated by al-Hakim in al-Mustadrak, and he said: This is an authentic hadith according to the conditions of the two sheikhs, and they did not include it.*
The seventh doubt:
The objector said: How do you praise Lady Aisha when she cursed Uthman and accused him of disbelief, when the angels were shy of him
and she used to say all the time: Kill Naathal, may Allah kill Naathal. When she heard of his murder, she was happy with that
answer with the help of the Generous King:
This news did not come from any authentic chain of transmission at all and it is a clear lie against Lady Aisha…
Imam Al-Albani included this news in As-Silsilah Ad-Da’ifah 4/329 and said: This hadith is fabricated.
How can it be right that Lady Aisha would demand the killing of Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, and accuse him of disbelief when she was the first to grieve over his murder and demanded retribution from his killers so that they would receive from Allah what they deserve?!
The ninth suspicion:
Among their objections to the Mother of the Believers, Aisha, may God be pleased with her, was what was transmitted to us of her positions of jealousy for the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, including:
(1) On the authority of Hisham, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Aisha, she said: “Hala bint Khuwaylid, the sister of Khadija, asked permission to see the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace. He recognized Khadija’s request for permission and was relieved by that. He said: O God, Hala bint Khuwaylid. I became jealous and said: What do you remember of an old woman from the old women of Quraysh with red cheeks who perished in the course of time, and God replaced her with someone better than her?” 2437 Muslim
(2) On the authority of Umm Muhammad in the story of Aisha’s quarrel with Zainab and her cursing her until the Messenger of God said to Aisha: “Captivate her,” so Aisha cursed Zainab, and Zainab went to Fatima and said to her: Aisha has committed adultery with you and has done this, so Fatima came and Ali came to the end of the hadith… Sunan Abi Dawud 4: 276 Book of Etiquette .
( 3) In the hadith, Lady Aisha said about Lady Safiyya, “ Safiya is a woman and she gestured with her hand like this as if she meant short, so he said: She has mixed with a word that if the water of the sea were mixed with it, it would mix .” Narrated by Al-Tirmidhi.
4) Lady Aisha’s saying to the Prophet, peace be upon him: “ Your Lord hastens to fulfill your desires ,” when Khawlah bint Hakim offered herself to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him.
The answer to this is from several aspects:
First: Lady Aisha and all the Mothers of the Believers, despite their great status, virtues and piety, are human beings and no one is infallible except the Prophets of God Almighty… It is clear injustice for the enemies of God to ignore the good deeds of the Mother of the Believers Aisha, which fill books, and to lie in wait for her to make simple mistakes that can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and she only came out because of her young age at that time and the overwhelming feeling of love for the Messenger of God and her jealousy for him overpowered her thinking, which is something that women are born with!
Ayyad said: Al-Tabari and other scholars said: Jealousy is forgiven for women and there is no punishment for them in that situation because of their nature. For this reason, the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, did not rebuke Aisha for that. Ayyad commented on this by saying that Aisha did that because of her young age and the beginning of her youth.
The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, was mindful of this and was open-minded towards his wives, taking into consideration the nature of women...and he raised his family and taught them with wisdom, understanding, and intelligence, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him.
- Sometimes we find him tolerating the results of jealousy and dealing with it with kindness and gentleness as long as it does not cause harm to others. An example of this is:
An-Nasa’i narrated in his Sunan that Umm Salamah brought food in a plate of hers to the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) and his companions. Aisha came wearing a cloak and with her was a stone, so she split the plate with it. The Prophet (PBUH) put the two halves of the plate together and said to his companions: “Eat, your mother is jealous,” twice. Then the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) took Aisha’s plate and sent it to Umm Salamah and gave Umm Salamah’s plate to Aisha. Sunan An-Nasa’i 3894
An-Nasa’i narrated in his Sunan that Umm Salamah brought food in a plate of hers to the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) and his companions. Aisha came wearing a cloak and with her was a stone, so she split the plate with it. The Prophet (PBUH) put the two halves of the plate together and said to his companions: “Eat, your mother is jealous,” twice. Then the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) took Aisha’s plate and sent it to Umm Salamah and gave Umm Salamah’s plate to Aisha. Sunan An-Nasa’i 3894
- And sometimes he would warn her, peace be upon him, indirectly, that extreme jealousy may open the door to the harm of Satan, as in the hadith:
On the authority of Sayyida Aisha, that the Messenger of God left her at night. She said: I became jealous of him, so he came and saw what I was doing.
On the authority of Sayyida Aisha, that the Messenger of God left her at night. She said: I became jealous of him, so he came and saw what I was doing.
He said: What is the matter with you, Aisha? Are you jealous? I said: Why should someone like me not be jealous of someone like you?
He said: Has your devil come to you?
I said: O Messenger of Allah, is there a devil with me?
He said: Yes.
I said: And with every person is a devil?
He said: Yes. I said: And with you, O Messenger of Allah?
He said: Has your devil come to you?
I said: O Messenger of Allah, is there a devil with me?
He said: Yes.
I said: And with every person is a devil?
He said: Yes. I said: And with you, O Messenger of Allah?
He said: Yes, but my Lord helped me against him until I converted to Islam.
-
Sometimes the Prophet would advise her to be gentle, explaining to her the mistake if it occurred, and terrifying her of its consequences, as in the hadith narrated by Al-Tirmidhi on the authority of Aisha, who said:
“I told the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, about a man, and he said: ‘I would not be pleased to tell the story of a man, even though I have such and such.’ She said: ‘I said, O Messenger of God, Safiyyah is a woman,’ and she gestured with her hand like this, as if she meant short. He said: ‘You have mixed a word that if the water of the sea were mixed with it, it would mix.’” At-Tirmidhi, Volume 4, and Abu Dawud, Volume 2, 4875
- And sometimes the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, would denounce harshly if necessary, as in the narration of Ahmad and al-Tabarani on the authority of Aisha, who said: “ Hala bint Khuwaylid, the sister of Khadija, asked permission to see the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, and he recognized Khadija’s permission and was relieved by that. So he said: O God, Hala bint Khuwaylid, so I became jealous and said: What do you remember of an old woman from the old women of Quraysh with red cheeks who perished in the past, and God replaced her with someone better than her? She said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, became angry with an anger I had never seen the like of it, and he said: ‘God did not replace me with someone better than her. She believed in me when people disbelieved in me, and God provided her from me with what He did not provide for any of you.’ I said: O Messenger of God, pardon me, may God pardon you, and by God, do not let me mention Khadija after this day with anything that you dislike.”
May my father and mother be sacrificed for him, the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace... We see how he was the master of the first and the last, whom nations feared and whose great ministers from the knights of the Companions were ashamed to fill their eyes with him... How he was a humble husband, simple in life, and broad-minded with his wives, may God be pleased with them.
Second: The one who examines the objection finds that the news he mentioned to attack the Mother of the Believers is only counted in her favor, not against her.
Because all of these hadiths reached us through Lady Aisha herself… and this is only due to her great care and scientific honesty in conveying her news with the Messenger of God and the lessons learned from his Sunnah, peace be upon him… and also her keenness to inform us of the virtues of her peers from the Mothers of the Believers, even if the price was to report what she had committed of slips of jealousy… This, by God, is the climax of self-denial, honesty, and courage from her noble person, may God be pleased with her and satisfy her.
Let us look at the examples mentioned to see that there is no problem with them, God willing:
In the first hadith:
Narrated by Muslim on the authority of Aisha, she said
: “Hala bint Khuwaylid, Khadija’s sister, asked permission to see the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and he recognized Khadija’s permission and was relieved by that. He said: O Allah, Hala bint Khuwaylid, and I became jealous and said: What do you remember of an old woman from the old women of Quraysh with red cheeks who perished in the past, and Allah replaced her with someone better than her? And in the narration of Ahmad and al-Tabarani, she said: The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, became angry with an anger the like of which I had never seen before, and he said: ‘Allah did not replace me with someone better than her. She believed in me when the people disbelieved in me, and Allah provided her from me with what He did not provide for any of you.’ I said: O Messenger of Allah, pardon me, may Allah pardon you, and by Allah, do not let me mention Khadija after this day with anything that you dislike.”
: “Hala bint Khuwaylid, Khadija’s sister, asked permission to see the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and he recognized Khadija’s permission and was relieved by that. He said: O Allah, Hala bint Khuwaylid, and I became jealous and said: What do you remember of an old woman from the old women of Quraysh with red cheeks who perished in the past, and Allah replaced her with someone better than her? And in the narration of Ahmad and al-Tabarani, she said: The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, became angry with an anger the like of which I had never seen before, and he said: ‘Allah did not replace me with someone better than her. She believed in me when the people disbelieved in me, and Allah provided her from me with what He did not provide for any of you.’ I said: O Messenger of Allah, pardon me, may Allah pardon you, and by Allah, do not let me mention Khadija after this day with anything that you dislike.”
This hadith narrated by Aisha shows the virtues of the Mother of the Believers, Khadija, and the degree of the Messenger of God’s love and loyalty to her even after her death… and how he was so zealous with her that he rebuked Lady Aisha when she spoke about her… So she repented and said, “O Messenger of God, forgive me, may God forgive you, and by God, do not let me mention Khadija after this day with anything you would dislike.”
Had it not been for the narration of this news by Lady Aisha, the truthful one, we would not have known all of the above.
Let us also look at what Lady Aisha narrated about the virtues of the Mother of the Believers, Khadija.
Let us also look at what Lady Aisha narrated about the virtues of the Mother of the Believers, Khadija.
On the authority of Hisham, on the authority of his father, that Aisha said: “ I have never been jealous of any woman as I was of Khadija. She died three years before he married me because I used to hear him mention her. His Lord commanded him to give her good news of a house made of reeds in Paradise, and he used to slaughter a sheep and then give her as gifts from his friends. ” Al-Bukhari 2435
Uthman bin Abi Shaybah told us, Abdah told us, on the authority of Hisham bin Urwah, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Aisha, who said:
The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, gave Khadija bint Khuwaylid the good news of a house in Paradise.
Sahih Muslim - Book of the Virtues of the Companions - Chapter on the Virtue of Khadija, Mother of the Believers, may God be pleased with her 4462
The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, gave Khadija bint Khuwaylid the good news of a house in Paradise.
Sahih Muslim - Book of the Virtues of the Companions - Chapter on the Virtue of Khadija, Mother of the Believers, may God be pleased with her 4462
Abd bin Hamid told us, Abd al-Razzaq told us, Muammar told us, on the authority of al-Zuhri, on the authority of Urwah, on the authority of Aisha, who said:
The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, did not marry another woman after Khadija until she died. Narrated by Muslim.
The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, did not marry another woman after Khadija until she died. Narrated by Muslim.
The Mother of the Believers, Aisha, said in explaining the virtues of Zainab bint Jahsh:
(The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: The one who will join me first will be the one with the longest hand. She said: They were trying to see which one had the longest hand. She said: The one with the longest hand among us was Zainab, because she used to work with her hands and give in charity. ) Narrated by Muslim 4490
(The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: The one who will join me first will be the one with the longest hand. She said: They were trying to see which one had the longest hand. She said: The one with the longest hand among us was Zainab, because she used to work with her hands and give in charity. ) Narrated by Muslim 4490
Ibn Abd al-Barr said: We have narrated from various sources on the authority of Aisha, who said: Zainab bint Jahsh was equal to me in status with the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace. I have never seen a woman better in religion than Zainab, more pious to God, more truthful in speech, more devoted to kinship, and more generous in charity. May God be pleased with her.
Al-Isti’ab 4/316
Al-Isti’ab 4/316
Lady Aisha said about the virtue of Lady Sawda
: “ I have not seen a woman in whose place I would rather be than Sawda bint Zam’a .” Muslim 2657
: “ I have not seen a woman in whose place I would rather be than Sawda bint Zam’a .” Muslim 2657
She said in praise of Umm Salamah:
( When the Messenger of God married Umm Salamah, she was very sad because of what was mentioned to us about her beauty. So I was gentle until I saw her, and by God I saw many times what I described .) Al-Isabah 4: 459, Al-Tabaqat by Ibn Saad 8/75.
As for the second hadith:
On the authority of Umm Muhammad in the story of Aisha’s quarrel with Zainab and her cursing her until the Messenger of God said to Aisha: “Captivate her,” so Aisha cursed Zainab, and Zainab went to Fatima and said to her: Aisha has committed a crime against you and has done so, so Fatima came and Ali came to the end of the hadith… Sunan Abi Dawud 4: 276 Book of Etiquette.
On the authority of Umm Muhammad in the story of Aisha’s quarrel with Zainab and her cursing her until the Messenger of God said to Aisha: “Captivate her,” so Aisha cursed Zainab, and Zainab went to Fatima and said to her: Aisha has committed a crime against you and has done so, so Fatima came and Ali came to the end of the hadith… Sunan Abi Dawud 4: 276 Book of Etiquette.
We say:
(1) This hadith is weak. Al-Albani, may God have mercy on him, said: This hadith contains Ali bin Zaid bin Jud’an, who cannot be relied upon. He often contains reprehensible things in his narrations, and this is reprehensible. Umm Muhammad is unknown… End quote.
(2) Assuming that this incident is true, it is something similar to what happens between co-wives...and Lady Aisha remained silent and did not respond to Lady Zainab, may God be pleased with her, until the Messenger of God gave her permission, based on the Almighty’s saying: God does not like the public mention of evil except by one who has been wronged. And ever is God Hearing and Knowing.
As for the third hadith:
This is the hadith narrated by Al-Tirmidhi, in which it is narrated on the authority of Lady Aisha , “Safiya is a woman, and she gestured with her hand like this, as if she meant short, so he said: You have mixed a word that if the water of the sea were mixed with it, it would mix.”
So we learned from this hadith that the Messenger of God protected Lady Safiiya in her absence and responded to Lady Aisha, and we also learned the extent of the greatness of backbiting, even if it is by representation rather than the tongue…
And all of this knowledge was transmitted to us by Lady Aisha, may God be pleased with her.
So we learned from this hadith that the Messenger of God protected Lady Safiiya in her absence and responded to Lady Aisha, and we also learned the extent of the greatness of backbiting, even if it is by representation rather than the tongue…
And all of this knowledge was transmitted to us by Lady Aisha, may God be pleased with her.
As for the fourth hadith: It is the saying of Lady Aisha, “ I do not see your Lord except that He hastens to fulfill your desires ,” when Lady Khawla offered herself to the Prophet, peace be upon him.
The explanation is:
This is the hadith of Aisha mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari. Al-Nawawi said about the meaning of “hastens to fulfill your desires”: that is, He makes things easy for you and makes things easy for you, and for this reason He gave you good.
The explanation is:
This is the hadith of Aisha mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari. Al-Nawawi said about the meaning of “hastens to fulfill your desires”: that is, He makes things easy for you and makes things easy for you, and for this reason He gave you good.
Al-Qurtubi said: This is a statement that is highlighted by coquetry and jealousy, and it is of the same type as her saying, “I do not praise you both, nor do I praise anyone but Allah.” Otherwise, attributing desire to the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is not to be taken literally, because he does not speak from desire nor act from desire. If she had said, “To please you,” it would have been more appropriate, but jealousy is forgiven for saying such a thing.
What
makes it clear to us that Aisha’s statement was only a matter of coquetry and jealousy is what was reported from her in Sahih Muslim: Aisha said: “I was jealous of those who offered themselves to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace .” Sahih Muslim 10: 49. (Quoted)
What
makes it clear to us that Aisha’s statement was only a matter of coquetry and jealousy is what was reported from her in Sahih Muslim: Aisha said: “I was jealous of those who offered themselves to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace .” Sahih Muslim 10: 49. (Quoted)
Finally
We say to those who mock and ridicule the Mothers of the Believers and what they did out of natural jealousy for the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, and their false and aggressive accusations against them... Do you not look at the condition of women in your book?
We can hardly find a righteous woman in the Christians’ book .
Rather, almost all the women of the houses of prophecy and righteousness were spiteful, deceitful, or adulterous. Among these are:
Rather, almost all the women of the houses of prophecy and righteousness were spiteful, deceitful, or adulterous. Among these are:
The hatred of Sarah, Abraham’s wife (the war of co-wives)
We read in the Christian books that Sarah, Abraham’s wife, was so jealous that she used to beat Hagar and hurt her out of envy from herself (( And Sarai said to Abram, “Let my wrong be upon you! For I gave you my handmaid in marriage, and when I perceived that she was pregnant, she despised me. May the Lord judge between me and you.”) And Abram answered, “Behold, your handmaid is at your disposal; do with her as you please. So Sarai humiliated her until she fled from her .” [Genesis 16:4-6]
Then she unjustly and tyrannically asked him to expel Hagar and her infant son, and claimed that they had no right to inherit with her son Isaac after she had given birth to him!!
We read in the Christian books that Sarah, Abraham’s wife, was so jealous that she used to beat Hagar and hurt her out of envy from herself (( And Sarai said to Abram, “Let my wrong be upon you! For I gave you my handmaid in marriage, and when I perceived that she was pregnant, she despised me. May the Lord judge between me and you.”) And Abram answered, “Behold, your handmaid is at your disposal; do with her as you please. So Sarai humiliated her until she fled from her .” [Genesis 16:4-6]
Then she unjustly and tyrannically asked him to expel Hagar and her infant son, and claimed that they had no right to inherit with her son Isaac after she had given birth to him!!
“And Sarah saw that the son of Hagar, whom she had borne, was mocking with her son Isaac; so she said to Abraham, ‘Cast out this slave girl and her son, for the son of the slave girl will not be heir with my son Isaac.’ But the thing was grievous in Abraham’s heart because of his son. But God said to him, ‘Do not let the child and your slave girl grieve you, but listen to the voice of Sarah in all that she advises you; for through Isaac your descendants will be named, and I will raise up a nation also from the son of the slave girl, because he is your descendants .’” [Genesis 21:9-13]
The strange thing is that the Lord agreed with her only to satisfy her hatred.
Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Moses, was jealous of her brother's wife!!
We read in [Numbers 12: 1, 2, 9] the following: (( And Miriam and Aaron criticized Moses for marrying a Cushite woman, and said, Has the Lord spoken only to Moses? Has He not spoken to us also?... And the anger of the Lord was kindled against them, and He departed from them. And when the cloud was lifted from the tent of meeting, behold, Miriam was leprous as snow. And Moses and Aaron turned toward Miriam, and behold, she was afflicted with leprosy ))
We read in [Numbers 12: 1, 2, 9] the following: (( And Miriam and Aaron criticized Moses for marrying a Cushite woman, and said, Has the Lord spoken only to Moses? Has He not spoken to us also?... And the anger of the Lord was kindled against them, and He departed from them. And when the cloud was lifted from the tent of meeting, behold, Miriam was leprous as snow. And Moses and Aaron turned toward Miriam, and behold, she was afflicted with leprosy ))
Father Elias Makar says in his book “Women of the Holy Bible”: { Moses married a Cushite woman, and this is not the place to judge him or him, whether he made a mistake or was right. Note, my brother reader, the style of arrogance and innuendo towards the Prophet of God, Moses. Rather, one thing concerns us: the one who thinks of hearts and reveals secrets discovered a black current flowing from the heart of Mary... an ungenerous emotion... a feeling of jealousy and envy towards this intruder, whom Moses brought to live in his house... Mary became angry with Moses and provoked her gentle brother, Aaron .}
It is clear from the Christians’ book and the interpretations of their leaders that jealousy and envy had taken hold of a woman who had reached the level of prophecy, so she mocked her brother and incited her other brother against him as well.
The strange thing is that the Lord took revenge on her by afflicting her with leprosy, but did not harm Aaron, even though he objected to Moses marrying her... This is the fanaticism of the unholy book against women!
The strange thing is that the Lord took revenge on her by afflicting her with leprosy, but did not harm Aaron, even though he objected to Moses marrying her... This is the fanaticism of the unholy book against women!
Michal, David's wife, ridicules her husband after she finds him dancing like a fool!
We read in 2 Samuel 6:20 Michal’s words to David: “ What was the honor of the king of Israel today, when he paraded himself before the maids of his servants, as a fool parades himself ?”
We find Michal's sharp tongue with her husband, the prophet David, and her bad manners with him... Her punishment, as is the custom in the Holy Bible with women, was harsh... as she was deprived of having children until the day of her death!
(( And Michal, David's wife, bore no child to the day of her death )) 2 Samuel 6:23
(( And Michal, David's wife, bore no child to the day of her death )) 2 Samuel 6:23
This Michal had the strangest and dirtiest dowry known to history, which was a hundred foreskins - the piece of skin that is cut from the penis during circumcision - from the foreskins of the Philistines. What is even more amazing is that David agreed to this inhumane dowry and slaughtered a hundred Philistines to marry his beloved!
Bathsheba, the mother of Solomon, was committed adultery with David!
We come to the story of a woman who was supposed to be the wife of a prophet and the mother of a prophet.... But this woman was a fallen woman who did not know the meaning of honor... The cross worshippers who attacked Lady Aisha because she performed ablution in front of her brother... forgot that Bathsheba, the wife of the mother of Solomon and the wife of David, to whom Christians sing the attribution of Christ and to her personally...
Her decadence reached the point of bathing naked without wearing a veil to cover her from people. One day, David looked from the roof of his palace and found her bathing naked. He was fascinated by her and sent for her and committed adultery with her. She became pregnant by him and told him... So he sent her husband Uriah, who was one of his faithful and struggling commanders in battle, and carried the standard for him to be killed, and it happened... Then he married her and gave birth to Manhal Solomon!! [2 Samuel 11]
We come to the story of a woman who was supposed to be the wife of a prophet and the mother of a prophet.... But this woman was a fallen woman who did not know the meaning of honor... The cross worshippers who attacked Lady Aisha because she performed ablution in front of her brother... forgot that Bathsheba, the wife of the mother of Solomon and the wife of David, to whom Christians sing the attribution of Christ and to her personally...
Her decadence reached the point of bathing naked without wearing a veil to cover her from people. One day, David looked from the roof of his palace and found her bathing naked. He was fascinated by her and sent for her and committed adultery with her. She became pregnant by him and told him... So he sent her husband Uriah, who was one of his faithful and struggling commanders in battle, and carried the standard for him to be killed, and it happened... Then he married her and gave birth to Manhal Solomon!! [2 Samuel 11]
Sarah, Abraham's wife, trades in herself to gain many benefits from her!!
(And it came to pass, when he was about to enter Egypt, that he said to Sarai his wife, “Behold, I know that you are a woman of beautiful appearance. 12And it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians see you, that they will say, ‘This is his wife.’ And they will kill me, but they will let you live. 13Say, ‘You are my sister,’ that it may be well with me for your sake, and that my life may live for your sake.”) (Genesis 12:14)
Rachel, Jacob's wife, worships idols, steals from them, and lies for them!
The Torah tells us that another woman from the Houses of Prophecy, Rachel, the wife of the Prophet Jacob and the mother of the Prophet Joseph, made her husband a large piece of paper... While her husband was supposed to be carrying out his duty of calling to the One God, we are surprised that his wife Rachel was a thief and a polytheist at the same time... as she stole her father's idols and kept them for herself, and Jacob was the last to know what was going on in his house!
30You went away from me because you longed for your father’s house, but why did you steal my gods?” 31And Jacob answered him, “I was afraid that you would take your daughters from me by force. 32But if you find your gods with one of us, he is not worthy to live. Prove what is yours with me before our men, and take it.” Now Jacob did not know that Rachel had stolen Laban’s gods. 33So Laban went into Jacob’s tent, into Leah’s tent, and into the tent of the maidservants, but he found nothing. Then he went out from Leah’s tent and went into Rachel’s tent. 34Now Rachel had taken And she put them in a camel's saddle and sat on them. And Laban searched the whole tent, but found nothing. 35And Rachel said to her father, "Let it not anger you, my lord, that I cannot stand before you, for I am like the custom of women." But Laban did not find his idols that he had searched for. Genesis 30:31
We conclude from this text the following:
A- That Laban, Jacob’s father-in-law, partner and helper, was an infidel polytheist.
B- That Rachel, the mother of the Prophet Joseph and the wife of the Prophet Jacob, whom the Jews often call themselves by, was a polytheist woman who stole her father’s idols and even lied to cover up her theft!
B- That Rachel, the mother of the Prophet Joseph and the wife of the Prophet Jacob, whom the Jews often call themselves by, was a polytheist woman who stole her father’s idols and even lied to cover up her theft!
C- That the house of the Prophet Jacob, the son of the prophets and the father of the prophets, was a place of polytheism with God, and the shocking thing is that he did not denounce his father-in-law when he came seeking pagan idols, but rather he helped him and threatened whoever might have hidden these filth, emphasizing that the thief of these idols does not deserve to live!
Leah, Jacob's wife and mother of ten tribes, deceives Jacob and commits adultery with him!
21And Jacob said to Laban, “The time is fulfilled; give me my wife that I may marry her.” 22So Laban gathered all the people of Haran together and made a feast for them. 23And at evening he took Leah instead of Rachel and brought her to Jacob, and he went in to her. 24And Laban gave his handmaid Zilpah to his daughter Leah. 25And when morning came, Jacob knew that it was Leah, and he said to Laban, “What have you done to me? Did I not serve you to take Rachel? Why then have you deceived me?” Genesis 29:21-25
Here we find how Jacob fell into the trap of Leah, thinking she was Rachel, that is, he committed adultery with her because she was not intended for marriage,
and how she made him a piece of paper and slept with him without him knowing who he was sleeping with,
then Jacob combined her and her sister as two wives at once!
and how she made him a piece of paper and slept with him without him knowing who he was sleeping with,
then Jacob combined her and her sister as two wives at once!
Rebecca, the wife of the Prophet Isaac and the mother of the Prophet Jacob, deceives and cheats her husband in his old age!
We read in Genesis 27 about Rebekah, Jacob’s wife, who took advantage of her husband’s weakness and illness to deprive Esau of the right to bless and put Jacob in Esau’s place to bless falsely and deceitfully:
(And Rebekah heard when Isaac spoke to Esau his son. And when Esau went out into the field to hunt game and bring it to his father, 6Rebekah said to Jacob her son, “I heard your father say to your brother Esau, 7Bring me game and prepare for me delicious food, that I may eat of it and bless you before the Lord before I die. 8Now therefore, my son, obey my voice and do as I command you. 9Go to the flock and bring me two young goats, the best of the goats, that I may prepare them for your father as delicious food, such as he loves. 10And you shall bring them to your father, and he shall eat, that he may bless you before the Lord. 12But what if my father feels me and finds me a liar? Shall I not bring a curse upon myself and not a blessing?” 13And his mother said to him, “On me is your curse, my son! All you have to do is listen to my voice and go and bring me the kids.” 14So he went and brought them to his mother, and she prepared savory food such as his father liked. 15And Rebekah took the best clothes of her older son Esau, which she had in the house, and put them on her younger son Jacob. 16And she covered his hands and the smooth part of his neck. With goatskins. 17And Rebekah gave Jacob the food and the bread she had prepared. [Genesis 27:5-17]
Lot's two daughters insult their father, the prophet, and get him drunk, then commit fornication with him!
“And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in a cave in the mountain, he and his two daughters. And the firstborn said to the younger, ‘Our father is old, and there is not a man on the earth to come in to us. Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve offspring from our father.’ So they made their father drink wine that night. And the firstborn went in and lay with her father; and he did not know when she lay down or when she rose up. And it came to pass on the next day that the firstborn said to the younger, ‘Behold, I lay last night with my father; come, let us make him drink wine tonight also.’ So the younger arose and lay with him; and he did not know when she lay down or when she rose up. So Lot’s two daughters conceived by their father.” (Genesis 19:30)
Solomon's wives were infidels who led him to disbelieve in God!
(And Solomon was fond of many foreign women, besides Pharaoh’s daughter. So he married Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women, all of whom were daughters of the nations that the Lord had forbidden the children of Israel to marry, saying to them, “You shall not marry them, nor shall they marry you, for they will seduce your hearts after their gods.”) But Solomon clung to them because of his great love for them. And he had seven hundred wives, and three hundred concubines, but they turned his heart away from the LORD. And they were able to entice his heart after other gods, so his heart was not right with the LORD. And he served Ashtaroth, the god of the Sidonians. [1 Kings 11:1]
The wife of the prophet of God, Hosea, is a prostitute!! (And when the Lord spoke to Hosea, saying: Go, take for yourself a prostitute and children of prostitution, for the land has committed utter prostitution
Samson's women are between harlots and traitors!
We read in the Book of Judges that Samson, who came with a divine promise and a blessing from God (Judges 13:2-5), married a Philistine woman and then made a bet with her people that if they could solve his riddle, he would give them thirty shirts and thirty robes... So they recruited his wife, but she kept trying to trick him and crying all the time until he told her the solution because of the many harassments she was experiencing. So she betrayed him and told her people, so he was forced to fulfill his vow and killed thirty innocent people and presented their jewelry and clothes as payment for the bet!! [Judges 14]
And Samson said to them when they knew the solution, “Unless you had committed a sin against my riddle, you would not have found the solution to my riddle.” [Judges 14:18]
And Samson said to them when they knew the solution, “Unless you had committed a sin against my riddle, you would not have found the solution to my riddle.” [Judges 14:18]
Notice how much women are humiliated in the Christians’ book, as they describe them as hasty!!
Then Samson loved another woman named Delilah, so the Philistines recruited her to find out the secret of his strength... Samson lied three times, and in the end he told her the secret of his strength
: “I have been a Nazirite to the Lord since my birth, so I have not shaved my hair. But if I shave it, my strength will leave me, and I will become weak like any other man.” [Judges 16:17]
Thus, Samson was captured and humiliated after “ she laid him on her knee, and brought a barber, who shaved off his seven locks of hair, and she began to humiliate him after his strength had left him .” [Judges 16]
: “I have been a Nazirite to the Lord since my birth, so I have not shaved my hair. But if I shave it, my strength will leave me, and I will become weak like any other man.” [Judges 16:17]
Thus, Samson was captured and humiliated after “ she laid him on her knee, and brought a barber, who shaved off his seven locks of hair, and she began to humiliate him after his strength had left him .” [Judges 16]
Among the women in Samson’s life was also a prostitute whom he went to and committed fornication with in Gaza
. “ And one day Samson went to Gaza, where he met a prostitute and went in to her .” [Judges 16:1]
. “ And one day Samson went to Gaza, where he met a prostitute and went in to her .” [Judges 16:1]
Thamar
Tamarackna, the daughter of Judah and the grandmother of Christ, deceives Judah, the chief of the tribes, and commits adultery with him without him knowing her identity. Then this adultery produces Perez, the great-grandfather of Christ! [Genesis 38]
Dina, the daughter of Jacob, was raped by Shechem, son of Hamor!
The Torah tells us that Dina, the daughter of Jacob, went out to visit some of her friends, and Shechem, son of Hamor, approached her, raped her, and defiled her honor [Genesis 34:2]
The Torah tells us that Dina, the daughter of Jacob, went out to visit some of her friends, and Shechem, son of Hamor, approached her, raped her, and defiled her honor [Genesis 34:2]
Rahab, the grandmother of Christ, was a prostitute and a traitor!
The Torah tells us the story of Rahab, that adulterous woman who betrayed her people who did nothing except to protect their country from a colonizer who wanted neither faith nor justice from them, but only wanted to slaughter or enslave them!
So she betrayed them to protect the spies of the Jews, and then she was considered a saint... because it is the nature of the colonizer to elevate the status of traitors to their homelands as long as they achieve his interests, and to consider those who resist him as heroes and terrorists. So when the Jews took control of the country, they burned it and wiped it out completely. As for Rahab, she sold her people in order to save herself and her family.
So she betrayed them to protect the spies of the Jews, and then she was considered a saint... because it is the nature of the colonizer to elevate the status of traitors to their homelands as long as they achieve his interests, and to consider those who resist him as heroes and terrorists. So when the Jews took control of the country, they burned it and wiped it out completely. As for Rahab, she sold her people in order to save herself and her family.
((And Joshua spared Rahab the harlot, and her household, and all that she had, and she dwells among the people of Israel to this day, because she hid the spies)) [Joshua 2:25]
And this prostitute Rahab is the mother of Boaz, the grandfather of Christ!
Paul says about her: “ By faith Rahab the harlot did not perish with the disobedient, if she received the spies in peace ” [Hebrews 11:31].
So look at this heretic Paul, as he describes a prostitute who ran a brothel as a believer, and he attributes the reason for that to her betrayal of her people,
which was a betrayal that took place to ensure her personal security and her money, and the Torah did not even say that she united God after living among the Jews!!
So look at this heretic Paul, as he describes a prostitute who ran a brothel as a believer, and he attributes the reason for that to her betrayal of her people,
which was a betrayal that took place to ensure her personal security and her money, and the Torah did not even say that she united God after living among the Jews!!
Esther
The People of the Book sanctify this woman and consider her a model of the Israelite girl who saved her people from annihilation by exploiting her femininity and beauty, as she seduced the king to ask him to help her and her people and kill Haman, and he did!!
This story established in the Jewish-Christian thought the permissibility of sacrificing honor for a girl to achieve her noble goals, and from here the use of girls to achieve politics became a characteristic of the People of the Book.
This story established in the Jewish-Christian thought the permissibility of sacrificing honor for a girl to achieve her noble goals, and from here the use of girls to achieve politics became a characteristic of the People of the Book.
Ruth the Moabite, grandmother of Christ
This Ruth is the grandmother of Christ, and it is assumed that she and her descendants are among the people of eternal hell because she is a Moabite, and the Lord says about the Moabites: “ And no Ammonite or Moabite, or any of their descendants, shall enter the congregation of those who believe in the Lord, even to the tenth generation forever. ” Deuteronomy 23:4
Thus we find that the homes of the prophets were inhabited only by wretched, infidel, adulterous, or treacherous women.
Even if we studied the Holy Book extensively, we would hardly find a righteous woman, starting with Eve, whom they make the root of all calamity, and ending with the adulterous woman who was one of the most famous disciples of Jesus and was not ashamed to wipe his feet with the hair of her head in front of the men, in a disgusting scene!!
Even if we studied the Holy Book extensively, we would hardly find a righteous woman, starting with Eve, whom they make the root of all calamity, and ending with the adulterous woman who was one of the most famous disciples of Jesus and was not ashamed to wipe his feet with the hair of her head in front of the men, in a disgusting scene!!
Is it right for someone who treated this as the state of their righteous women and the wives of their prophets
to utter a single word against the pure and chaste Mothers of the Believers?
to utter a single word against the pure and chaste Mothers of the Believers?
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment