Responding to the doubt about the Messenger touching a woman’s chest - breast

 

In the name of God, the most gracious, the most merciful

I read on some websites a hadith that the descendants of the Magi think is a way to attack the Sunnis and the hadiths mentioned in the books of the Sunnis. Of course, the Sunnis have something called “the science of men.” The questioner is ignoring this science and the Sunnis’ right to it, and the one who lacks something will not pay attention to it when he throws out the impurity in his toilet, of course.
The hadith that is the subject of doubt: Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah said: Affan told us, Abd al-Warith told us, Hanzalah told us , on the authority of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: A woman came to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and said: O Messenger of Allah, wipe my face and supplicate to Allah Almighty for me. He (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) wiped her face and supplicated to Allah Almighty for her. She said: O Messenger of Allah, lower your hand. So the Prophet (PBUH) lowered his hand to her chest. She said: O Messenger of Allah, lower your hand. But the Prophet (PBUH) refused and moved her away.
This is the hadith, the Prophet ( PBUH) said to you to put his hand on the chest of a woman and she was saying if you lower your hand O Messenger of Allah, so he lowered it and when he saw her, she kept saying to him... He left her and went away. The filthy Rafidi mentioned it under the title of the Prophet [kissing and touching], Allah the Almighty said: "Indeed, the curse of Allah is upon the wrongdoers", he wants to work according to the principle - do not tell me and I will not tell you that worries afflict me and you - and I will tell him that worries afflict him again. First of all, the narration is weak and is not authentic in its text or chain of transmission, because it includes "Hanthalah Al-Sadosi" who is weak, and he got confused... with his response!! Weak and confused!!?? Yes.. but the shameful Rafidi did not bother to open a single book from which he could quote the criticism and approval of the people of Hadith for the chain of narrators, so he only succeeded in stealing. Abu al-Hasan al-Maymuni said, on the authority of Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Weak hadith... Abu Bakr al-Athram said: I asked Abu Abdullah about Hanzala al-Sadosi, so he said: Hanzala - and he extended his voice - then he said: That one is a fabricator of hadith, he narrates strange things, he narrated on the authority of Anas, it was said: O Messenger of Allah, do we bow to each other, and on the authority of Anas that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, used to supplicate in the Qunut, and on the authority of Shahr on the authority of Ibn Abbas: The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, used to recite in the Fajr prayer. And his weakness... Salih ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal said, on the authority of his father: Weak hadith, he narrates fabricated hadiths on the authority of Anas. Al-Busayri said to you in Ithaaf al-Khayrah, volume 6, p. 471, he said about the hadith: Authentic chain of transmission. Reply: Al-Busayri is not an infallible angel. Even if I am not mistaken, Al-Busayri (may Allah have mercy on him) relied on Ibn Hibban’s mention of Hanzala in Al-Thiqat in his Sahih Al-Isnad, and Al-Saji’s statement that Hanzala is truthful. Of course, Ibn Hibban’s mention of him in Al-Thiqat does not mean that he is trustworthy, and Al-Saji’s statement is not to be relied upon because most of the scholars of Hadith have weakened Hanzala and deliberately rejected his narration, and there is almost a consensus on weakening his narration. As for Ibn Hibban’s authentication of him, assuming that it is for the sake of argument, it is as the scholars said: “What Ibn Hibban knew about him - Hanzala - was hidden from him, which others knew.” Ibn Hibban may have authenticated him in some of the Hadiths that he narrated and that Ibn Hibban knows about. In this case, Ibn Hibban’s authentication of him is because of those authentic narrations that he narrated. As happened with some of the narrators of the two Sahihs. They are authenticated by Al-Bukhari and Muslim, but they are criticized by others.










Therefore, if we go back to the chain of transmission, we will find in it the weakness of Hanzala, and they have no choice but to weaken the hadith, because Al-Busiri or anyone else is not an angel, and we do not testify to anyone’s infallibility.
Moreover, in Al-Mataleb Al-Aliyah by Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, verified by a group of researchers in a university thesis with the coordinator Dr. Saad bin Nasser bin Abdul Aziz Al-Shathri, published by Dar Al-Asemah for Publishing and Distribution - Dar Al-Ghaith for Publishing and Distribution, they came to the hadith, volume 15, page 616, and said: Its degree: weak due to the weakness of Hanzala.
And peace be upon those who follow the guidance.