suck the cliiitttoris of lat

 It is not permissible to mention the private parts of a person unless there is a necessity or if the interest requires it, such as the prescribed punishments. In the case

of prescribed punishments, euphemisms, insinuations, or innuendos are of no use, nor when fighting enemies in order to annoy them. It is well known that Islam is the religion of goodness and good morals. Among the matters established in Islamic law is that Islam forbids everything that harms others in word or deed. It forbade mockery, as Allah the Almighty said: “Let not a people ridicule [another] people.” It forbade calling one another by nicknames, as Allah the Almighty said: “And do not insult one another by nicknames.” It forbade backbiting, as Allah the Almighty said: “And do not backbite one another.”
Rather, he ordered his followers to address their opponents with wisdom and good advice, not with harsh, rough words. Allah the Almighty said: “Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good instruction, and argue with them in a way that is best.”

The warning came more than once against the tongue and the evils that the tongue brings upon its owner, as Allah the Almighty said: “Not a word does he utter except that by him is an observer ever present.”
And in the Prophetic hadith: “Hold this (your tongue).”

As for what the questioner mentioned in his letter about using some of these words, such as explicitly mentioning the name of the private parts in the hadith that is authentically reported from the Prophet, may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him: “Whoever condoles with the condolences of the Age of Ignorance, bite his father with them, and do not use euphemisms.” Al-Albani authenticated it from the hadiths of Mishkat Al-Masabih.
And in mentioning the father’s penis here is a beautiful gesture mentioned by Ibn Al-Qayyim in Zaad Al-Ma’ad:
And mentioning the father’s penis here was the best reminder for this arrogant person with the call of ignorance about the organ from which it came out, which is his father’s penis, so he should not overstep his bounds.

This method was intended by the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) for that arrogant man who calls with the call of ignorance and is fanatical and triumphs with their attributes, which is affiliation with them in the call, such as his saying: O Qais! O Yemen! O Hilal! O Assad. So whoever is fanatical about the people of his town, or his sect, or his path, or his kinship, and intends by this fanaticism to divide the community of Islam and is arrogant towards others by mentioning his family and his household, then remind such an arrogant person of his own self and how it came out of his father’s organ. In this reminder is the most eloquent warning.
The stubborn person may be repelled by a harsh, deterrent word, while others may be repelled by a kind word. So it is appropriate for the stubborn, arrogant person who seeks comfort from the consolation of ignorance to be confronted with this harsh word so that he does not return to something like it again, so that he does not hear this word again.

If stating the name of the private parts is not permissible, but if the situation requires this statement, it is permissible, Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah stated in Minhaaj As-Sunnah:
Some scholars said: This indicates the permissibility of stating the name of the private parts out of need and interest, and it is not from the forbidden obscenity, as in the hadith of Ubayy ibn Ka’b from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, who said: If you hear someone offering condolences in the manner of the Jahiliyyah, bite his father’s penis and do not use euphemisms. Narrated by Ahmad, Ubayy ibn Ka’b heard a man saying: O so-and-so, so he said: Bite your father’s penis. He was asked about that, and he said: This is what the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, commanded us to do. End quote.

As for the situation of Ma’iz and the hadith of his stoning, there is a necessity that required the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, to state the explicit wording and not use euphemisms for it, because the Messenger was in a position to apply a punishment to someone who confessed to adultery, so the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, wanted Ma’iz not to confess to anything except an act that he had done explicitly, not something close or distant from itt.

The hadith was narrated by Al-Bukhari and Ahmad in his Musnad on the authority of Al-Miswar bin Makhrama and Marwan bin Al-Hakam, who said: ... So, Urwah bin Masoud came to him and began to speak to the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and the Prophet said something similar to what he said to Badil. Then Urwah said: O Muhammad, tell me, if you were to uproot the affairs of your people, have you ever heard of anyone among the Arabs who wiped out his family before you? If it is the other way around, then by Allah I see faces and I see some of the people who are fit to flee and leave you. Abu Bakr said to him: Suck the clitoris of Al-Lat, should we flee from him and leave him?... The hadith. Al-Hafiz said in Al-Fath: It was the custom of the Arabs to curse in this way, but using the word “mother.” Abu Bakr wanted to exaggerate in cursing Urwah by placing the one he worshipped in the place of his mother. He was motivated to do this by what angered him by attributing the Muslims to fleeing. This includes the permissibility of uttering ugly words in order to deter someone who shows that he deserves that. Ibn Al-Numair said about Abu Bakr’s statement: It is to belittle the enemy, to disbelieve them, and to hint at obligating them from their statement that Al-Lat is the daughter of Allah - may Allah be exalted far above that - that if she were a daughter, she would have what females have . End quote. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said in Zaad Al-Ma’ad: In the statement of Abu Bakr to Urwah (Suck the clitoris of Al-Lat) is evidence of the permissibility of explicitly mentioning the name of the private parts if there is an interest required by that situation . End quote. Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said : When the one being addressed is unjust, we are not commanded to respond to him in the best way . End quote. Therefore, if the situation calls for uttering such a word in order to serve the public interest and prevent harm, then there is no harm in that, and there is no contradiction between it and the prohibition of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in what was narrated by al-Tirmidhi and Ahmad on the authority of ‘Abdullah ibn Mas’ood, who said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “ A believer is not a slanderer, nor a curser, nor a vulgar or obscene person. ” This is evidenced by the words of Allaah the Most High: {Allaah does not like the public mention of evil except by one who has been wronged. And ever is Allaah Hearing and Knowing.} (148) Surah al-Nisaa’. Also, if it was a violation, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) would have prohibited it, and he would have approved of it, and he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) does not approve of falsehood . See Fatwa No. 55887.
And Allaah knows best.

Quoted from the following link:
http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/Fatwa/S...Option=FatwaId

al-Lat is a stone idol that has no mind and no clitoris either,
so you will not bite anything.
Saying bite the clitoris of al-Lat is like saying drink from the sea
and less than that, because the sea exists and the clitoris of al-Lat is an illusion.

And thus the doubt ends.

Abu Bakr did not tell him to bite the clitoris of your mother,
as for al-Lat, she did not have what Abu Bakr told him to bite.

Rather, Abu Bakr explains to him the corruption in his worship of stones
and the corruption in the ignorant taking daughters and females for the Lord of the Worlds, and

al-Siddiq rises above him by denouncing his statement. By Muslims turning away from the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, at the same time,

as I tell you, we follow the predecessors and communicate with them through books that denounce our taking from them, so we are like this. Drink from the sea,
but the sea can be drunk from.
As for the clitoris of al-Lat, it is an imaginary matter that cannot be bitten.

What is meant is something else other than the clitoris and other than biting that the
stone worshippers understand, which is that the idols of al-Lat do not have a clitoris,
and Allah does not have female daughters from the angels,
and there is no deity except Allah.

Just as it is not possible to bite the clitoris of al-Lat,

there is no possible worship for these illusions.

Both are an illusion ( the clitoris is an illusion ) ( and worship is an illusion ).

It is an arrogance of truth over falsehood by Abu Bakr against the disbeliever who was not polite with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace. The Muslims did not separate from him before that or after that.
The words of the disbeliever are an illusion,
just as the clitoris of al-Lat is an illusion.

This is a response that is not transmitted from the books of the predecessors,
so that you do not get angry with our virtuous teacher, the daughter of Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi, who is one of our righteous predecessors, God willing,
and so that you do not get angry with my saying bite the clitoris of al-Lat,
for al-Lat does not have a clitoris and al-Lat no longer exists after Islam was completed. On this false worship

only I explained to you a different understanding of what the Christians who put forth the doubt understood of the saying of the friend, may God be pleased with him.
These doubts were put forth in the sixth century after the Hijra, stripped of the understanding of the predecessors of these hadiths and with a distortion in understanding to confuse the understanding of the public, and
they were responded to hundreds of times,
but they transmit the doubts and do not transmit the responses to them because the church preserved the doubts for you or preserved those who presented them to you
and concealed from you the responses of the Muslims to them,
and you come flexing your muscles as if you have brought the wolf by the tail and want a response that is not in the books and strange talk,

but your wolf’s tail is just an illusion that
shows that you did not kill its tail.

We must differentiate between legal controls and human convictions regarding what is permissible to say or not to say.

The legal controls are the basis and main reference for the Muslim person . If what was reported from the Messenger (may God bless him and grant him peace) is true, then it is necessary to believe in it and do it without introducing our convictions because he (may God bless him and grant him peace) is more knowledgeable about the interests of the believers and because he, of course, ( does not speak from his own desires ).

Our belief in what was reported from the Messenger of God (may God bless him and grant him peace), if it is true, is the same belief and approach of Abu Bakr (may God be pleased with him), and it is:

If he said it, he told the truth .

Then, when Islam began with the mission of the Master of Creation, Muhammad (may God bless him and grant him peace), the customs of the people of ignorance were prevalent, and in them were good and bad, so Islam arose.

Some people are forbidden

{ O you who have believed, indeed, intoxicants, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone alters [to other than God], and divining arrows are but defilement from the work of Satan, so avoid it that you may be successful .}

Definitely on the good customs of the Arabs

Some people are restricted

It is not permitted except in what was specified by the Messenger (may God bless him and grant him peace).

In our case, this saying was widespread in the pre-Islamic era and was considered obscene, so Islam came and prohibited obscenity.

The Messenger of God (may God bless him and grant him peace) said :

“ The believer is not a slanderer, nor a curser, nor a person who speaks obscenely, nor a person who uses foul language.”

So he forbade every obscene statement, even this statement.

But.....

The Messenger of God (may God bless him and grant him peace) came and permitted this statement in one situation.

The Messenger of God (may God bless him and grant him peace) said :

“Whoever offers condolences in the manner of the Age of Ignorance, then bite him with them, his father , and do not use euphemisms.”


By combining the two hadiths, this statement is restricted and can only be said in such a situation .

You must know that Islam cannot be taken from one part and left out, because Islam is a single unit whose parts complete each other.

As the Messenger (may God bless him and grant him peace) said:

"Whoever seeks consolation with the consolation of the Age of Ignorance, then bite him with them like his father , and do not use euphemisms."

He also said (may God bless him and grant him peace):

O Abu Dharr! How will you be if you are among the scum? And he interlaced his fingers. I said: O Messenger of God! What do you command me? He said: Be patient, be patient, be patient. Deal with people according to their morals , and differ from them in their actions.

It was reported in Sahih Al-Bukhari on the authority of Ali, with a chain of transmission traceable back to the Prophet

Tell people what they know. Do you like God and His Messenger to be called liars?

Al-Daylami also narrated on the authority of Ibn Abbas that he said:

O Ibn Abbas, do not tell people things that their minds cannot bear .

Al-Bayhaqi narrated in Al-Sha’b on the authority of Al-Muqaddam bin Ma’di Karib, with a chain of transmission traceable to the Prophet:

“If you speak to people about their Lord, do not speak to them about what is difficult for them and difficult for them .”

It was narrated on the authority of Abu Hurairah

“I memorized two vessels from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. As for one of them, I have spread it, and as for the other, if I had spread it, this throat of mine would have been cut off .”

Al-Darqutni included in Al-Ifrad, on the authority of Sulayman ibn Abd al-Rahman ibn Abd al-Malik ibn Mihran, on the authority of Ubayd ibn Nujayh, on the authority of Hisham ibn Urwah, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Aisha, with a chain of transmission traceable to the Prophet:

" Reprimand your slaves according to their intelligence ."

This is the understanding of our righteous predecessors of the words of the Master of Creation, Muhammad (may God bless him and grant him peace). When reporting or implementing the words of the Messenger (may God bless him and grant him peace) in a way that is not required, of course, the Muslim has two choices :

1- If the desirable thing of reprimanding and rebuking the comforter will not happen except by saying this, then his saying is obligatory as long as it will not bring about corruption or lead to a dispute .

2- If this statement will lead to corruption and conflict ( because the person does not understand the intended meaning ), he should be told something that leads to the same meaning ( for example, we are all the children of nine ), and there is no harm in explaining the severity of his action by narrating to him a hadith of the Messenger of God (may God bless him and grant him peace).

I hope you get the meaning now.