The Myth of the Holy Shroud

 

Everyone knows what the Holy Shroud is. Its discoverers claim that it is the shroud in which Jesus was wrapped after his death. By following traces of blood on it, they determined the features of Jesus’ body , such as the height, shape, method of crucifixion, and even the size of the nails that the Romans used and their positions in Jesus’ body - this is our topic. An American scientist has refuted this claim and has proven beyond doubt that it is another trick of the fooled Christians . You will find research by this scientist in which he shows the naivety of those who believe that it is the shroud of Jesus, explaining many reasons, including (what is on the shroud is nothing but red dye and not blood, and this is after a negative blood test. Jesus, as mentioned in the Bible, was shrouded in more than one piece, a new trick from the tricks of the thirteenth century painters) http://www.mcri.org/Shroud.html

(The integrity of Jesus' bones ...a lie!)

This is our original topic.

We know that after Jesus was hung on the cross and after he asked for water because of his intense thirst, and vinegar was brought to him to drink, he gave up his spirit and died. The Romans did not realize his quick death, and they ordered his leg to be broken, along with those with him - those who were being crucified with him - to further torture him. When they went to him, they found that he had given up his spirit, so they refrained from breaking his leg. John 19:31 Then, because it was the preparation, so that the bodies would not remain upon the cross on the Sabbath (for that Sabbath day was an high day), the Jews asked Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away. 19:32 So the soldiers came and broke the legs of the first, and of the other who was crucified with him. 19:33 But when they came to Jesus, they did not break his legs, for they saw that he was already dead. 19:36 For this was done to fulfill the scripture which says, ‘No bone of him shall be broken.’ What is the story of the good news that Jesus’ bones were not broken, and how was the scripture fulfilled?! Father Antonious Fikry explains and says (Psalm 34:19,20) + No bone of the Passover lamb shall be broken. God had already foretold what would happen so that all would believe and have no excuse for their disbelief. To complete the features of the Passover lamb, His body was quickly taken down from the cross = Leave none of Him until the morning (Exodus 12:10). The spiritual meaning of His bones not being broken is that no one can corrupt His church. The bone of Christ is His church, His temple. Did Jesus’ bones really survive being crushed or broken during the crucifixion and the driving of nails?! It is difficult to imagine a nail about 18 cm long being driven into a person’s hand or foot without it coming into direct or tangential contact with a bone, crushing part of it - eroding it - .. unless those nails were placed in specific places far enough away from the bones to ensure the safety of the bone and to ensure the stability of the crucified person on the cross as well.

First, the location of the nail in the hand

As it came in John
20:20 And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. And the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord.
20:25 Then the other disciples said to him, “We have seen the Lord.” But he said to them, “Unless I see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

It is clearly evident to us that the place of the nail for the crucifixion was in the hand. As it came in the English translation ( hand ), and what is meant here is
.. as shown in the picture. Perhaps there is a question that comes to each of us.. How do the bones of the hand survive such a nail as shown in the picture?! Let us agree first .. that the effect of the weight of the crucified body downwards - the vertical position of the cross - plays a fundamental role in the importance of driving the nail in two places and no third. 1- Either the path is driven into a void - flesh - surrounded by bones on all sides .. to ensure that the nail does not tear the flesh under the effect of the weight and thus the crucified falls from the cross. 2- Either the nail is driven into the bones more fixed To clarify the matter .. we show you the bone of the hand It is clear from the picture that the only position in which the nail can be driven into Jesus' hand is to drive it into the carpal tunnel .. This means that the nail will be driven into Jesus' bones .. In this case, Jesus' bones will not be spared from breaking .. and the prophecy will not be fulfilled and the book will not be completed !! And here Christianity has become in a real problem ... But as usual, Christians rush to deception and lies, throwing the numbers of their book to the wall .. Some of them claimed that the hole that was in Jesus' hand was not in the palm of the hand as is inherited from the foot, but was in the wrist !! In the miracle of the Holy Shroud

 Quote Quote : The nails were in the hands in the wrist and not in the palm so that it could bear the weight of the body . The thumb was not visible in the shroud due to its contraction due to the nail touching the median nerve, which is the largest nerve. The nail was placed in the wrist in the space known medically as the space of Destot, which is the space surrounded by the bone. Therefore, no bone of it is broken, as the Bible says , “And no bone of it shall be broken” (John 19:36). The nail is 18 cm long.  

 

In popular
depictions of the crucifixion of Jesus (possibly because in translations of John 20:25 the wounds are described as being " in his hands "), Jesus is shown with
nails in his hands . But in Greek the word , usually translated as "hand", referred to arm and hand together, and to denote the hand as distinct from the arm some other word was added, as (he wounded the end of the , i.e. he wounded her hand ) This is the saint in question. If it is proven that Jesus was actually crucified by the wrist, then this saint is undoubtedly a liar. The one who claimed that Jesus appeared to him, and after he left, he was surprised by a lot of blood flowing from the palm of his hand - the place where Jesus was crucified - and the following response came : He was crucified on the palm of his hand and not on the wrist . Reverend George Carey, head of the Church Association, responds to the BBC - which rejected the fact that Jesus was crucified by the palm of the hand and confirmed that he was crucified by the wrist - that it is misleading the people by distorting the facts and it is very dangerous to do so, but it is completely sad and unfortunate and predictable that the nails of the crucifixion were in the palm of Jesus' hand and not in his forearm . We must be honest with history and the events that took place. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-this-way.html From here it becomes clear to us that the integrity of the bones of Jesus' hand is nothing but a lie

Secondly, the location of the nail in the foot

We follow the Christians' deception

of the miracle of the Holy Shroud

 Quote Quote : The two legs were nailed together with one nail, placing the left leg over the right, and the nail of the foot takes the form of a rectangular parallelepiped. It penetrates the metatarsus between the second and third metatarsal bones , and as we said, the two legs rested on a lower support so that he would not die quickly and could raise his body to breathe.  
 

They also look here to the integrity of the bones of Jesus' foot, as it is claimed that the nail penetrates the metatarsus in the space between the second and third phalanges , and thus the integrity of the bone, which is really funny.. If only Christians knew that we do not believe and must believe.. How is the space between the second and third phalanges arranged so that the left foot is completely under the right, so that the nail passes between them without hitting the bones of either of them??!! If the left foot has a second and third, then by placing it on the right - it is impossible to arrange it - the nail will pass - if it passes - between the third and fourth of the right foot.. So did the shroud not discover this!! As for the surprise, it is the following: the specific techniques of crucifixion employed by the Romans. The specific techniques used by the Romans in crucifixion and under the title ( Bones of a Crucified Man ) Translation Because many people were buried in primitive ways.. or perhaps left for animals to devour them, so we do not have much archaeological evidence of crucifixion in Judea, although no one doubts that thousands of Jews were crucified by the Romans, however, in 1968 a box of bones was found in a cave in the city of Jerusalem, this box contained the bones of a crucified man , and the bones still contained a nail that had been driven into the heel of the foot , which allowed scientists to learn a lot about the specific techniques used by the Romans in crucifixion.... The Romans were driving nails into the heel of the foot and not into the instep.. To know what the heels mean - the heel of the foot - we must clarify the bones of the foot and as we see that the heels - the heel of the foot - contains nothing but bone.. and this is the reason why the nail remained stuck to it after all these years.. as explained above, are we still Do we believe the myth that Jesus' bones are not broken?!! Here is the news with more clarification: In 1968, archaeological evidence was discovered in the northeast of Jerusalem, which were the remains of one of the people who were crucified in the first century. The remains included a heel bone penetrated by a nail from the side , and the head of the nail was curved. This is probably because the nail was struck upwards, which prevents it from being removed from the foot. At first glance, the length of the nail gives us the impression that it was hammered into both heels together. In conclusion, it is impossible for Jesus' bones to be safe from breaking, as we have explained.. for the following reasons : 1- He was crucified from the palm of his hand, as stated in ancient Greek and by the priests.. and the meaning of the palm of his hand is that the nails were hammered into the bones of the hand (carpal tunnel) to ensure stability and prevent slipping under the influence of weight. 2- The Roman technique for fixing the crucified person's foot was by hammering the nail into the heel of the foot to ensure stability.. and thus hammering the nail into the bone, as we have explained.