With Gabriel, peace be upon him, in the cave of Hira, Isaiah 29

 The seclusion of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, in the Cave of Hira and the way in which the Qur’an was revealed to him, and his being illiterate, who did not know how to write or read, is an achievement in the Book of Isaiah (29:12), this is its text: Isaḯas 29:12 And Gabriel, peace be upon him, in the Cave of Hira and the way in which the Qur’an was revealed to him, and his being illiterate, who did not know how to write or read, is an achievement in the Book of Isaiah (29:12 ) , this is its text: επι ϲ ταμενου γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι αυτω · αναγνωθι ταυτα και ερι . Ουκ αιπι ϲ ταμαι γραμʼματα Isaḯas 29:12 Kai do thissetai to livelion all butto eis chiras anthropouu: mi epistamenou gramʼmata ˙ kai eri afto: anagnothi tafta kai eri. Or the book is given in the cave of Hira to someone who does not know how to write , and it is said to him: “Read this.” Isaiah 12:29 Is this not exactly what was revealed to the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, in the early beginnings of revelation when Gabriel, peace be upon him, came down to him while he was in seclusion in the Cave of Hira and said to him: “ Read this ”? One of the most important things you must know is that there was no Arabic version of the Holy Bible in the sixth century AD, that is, when Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace , was alive. Moreover, he was illiterate. The Holy Qur’an says about him, may God bless him and grant him peace, in Surat Al-A’raf: {Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered prophet, whom they find It is written with them in the Torah and the Gospel . He enjoins upon them what is right and forbids them what is wrong and makes lawful for them the good things and prohibits for them the bad things and relieves them of their burden and the shackles which were upon them. So those who believe in him, honor him, support him, and follow the light which has been sent down with him - it is those who will be the successful (157). The text in all international translations: Meaning: “I do not know how to read” except in the Arabic translation which says: ( 12 Or the book is given to one who does not know how to read, and it is said to him, “Read this,” and he says, “I do not know how to read . ” Isaiah 29, text 12, Smith and VanDyke translation.

It is no secret that the intention behind distorting the Arabic translation and changing the phrase from (I do not know how to read) to (I do not know how to write) is a kind of distortion intended to distract the Arab reader from the realization of the story in its words in the Cave of Hira.
We will provide some translations of the text in Arabic and English, then we will provide the Hebrew and Greek texts of the verses to see :

First: The Arabic translations of the text Isaiah 29: 9-14

The common Arabic translation
Be perplexed and amazed! Be blind and blind! Be drunk, but not with wine! They staggered, but not from strong drink . The Lord has poured out upon you the spirit of stupor; He has closed the eyes of your prophets and covered the heads of those who see among you . All your visions have become obscure, like the words of a sealed book. You give it to someone who can read, saying, “Read this.” He says, “I cannot, for it is sealed.” Then you give it to someone who cannot read, saying, “Read this.” And he answers: (I do not know how to read) ..

Catholic translation
For the Lord has poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep and has closed your eyes (the eyes of the prophets) and has covered your heads (the heads of those who see) .. So all the visions have become to you as the words of a sealed book, which they hand to one who can read, saying: (Read this), and he says: (I cannot, for it is sealed) .. Then the book is handed to one who cannot read, and it is said to him: (Read this), and he says: (I do not know how to read) ..

Life translation
(Be astonished And they marveled, they were blind, they were blind. They were drunk, but not with wine. They were reeling, but not with strong drink. For the Lord has poured out upon you the spirit of a deep sleep. He has closed the eyes of your prophets and covered the heads of your seers.
And all this vision has become to you as the words of a sealed book, when they hand it to one who can read, saying, “Read this.” He answers: I cannot, because it is sealed. And when they hand it to someone who cannot read, saying: Read this, he answers: I cannot read .)

Second: The English text:
The attached English translation states the following:

Second: The English text:
The attached English translation states the following:


· 12. And the book is delivered to him that is not learned , saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.

Notice well I am not learned, meaning I am not educated, that is, illiterate.


This word, I am not learned, has been translated in many translations as (I do not know how to read), such as:

◄ Isaiah 29:12 ►

Parallel Verses

Isaiah 29:12English Standard Version (ESV)

¹² And when they give the book to one who cannot read, saying, “Read this,” he says, “I cannot read.”

New International Version
Or if you give the scroll to someone who cannot read, and say, “Read this, please,” they will answer, “ I don’t know how to read .”

King James Bible
And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he said, I am not learned.

Darby Bible Translation
And they give the book to him that cannot read, saying, Read this, I pray thee; and he said , I cannot read .

World English Bible
and the book is delivered to one who is not educated, saying, “Read this, please;” And he says, “ I can't read .”

Young's Literal Translation
And the book is given to him who hath not known books, Saying, 'Read this, we pray thee,' And he hath said, 'I have not known books .'



NASB: Then the book will be given to the one who is illiterate saying, “Please read this.” And he will say, “I cannot read .” (NASB ©1995)


GWT: Then you give the book to someone who can't read , saying, "Please read this." He answers, "I can't read ." (GOD'S WORD®)


DBY : And they give the book to him that cannot read , saying, Read this, I pray thee; And he said, I cannot read .

Third: The Hebrew text:

And in the Hebrew text :​​​​​​ The word : ( קְרָא ) , which is pronounced ( Kara ) , means reading , not Writing.

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/29-12.htm

וְנִתַּן הַסֵּפֶר, עַל אֲשֶׁר לֹא-יָדַע סֵפֶר לֵאמֹר-- קְרָא נָא-זֶה; וְאָמַר, לֹא יָדַעְתִּי סֵפֶר

Two technicians, this ambassador, on Asher, to bid farewell to Sever, to the More Kra Nazi, in Faymar, if you bid farewell to Sever

ְְוְנִתַּן ( wə·nit·tan And is delivered ) - הַסֵּפֶר ( has·sê·p̄er, the book ) - עַל ( 'al to him) - אֲשֶׁר ( 'ă·šer who) - ( lō- not )​​​​​​​​​​ qə·rā Read) - נָא־ nā) - I pray .​​​​​​

Westminster Leningrad Codex WLC ( Consonants)​

Only

)ReadmoreAleppo


Codex

now. Column XXIII The Great Isaiah Scroll 28:24 to29:21Version Isaiah from the Dead Sea Scroll :Image text:Prophet "AHMAD" is found in the Dead Sea Scrolls: http://www.answering-christianity.com/predict.htm The full manuscript with explanation is on the next page:

Manuscript explanation

For the line by line translation of this page http://www.ao.net/%7Efmoeller/qa-tran.htm#c23

Physical Characteristics:

The seam between this and the last page is readily apparent on the right and has been described in the last page. Otherwise this page is very well preserved and all words are clear with one exception due to scribal error in line 17 in the third from the last word on the line.
Paragraphs and Spatiums and Editorial Marks
: As is usual but not always the case the paragraphs and spatiums correspond with current versification. New paragraphs begin: line 7 = 29:1; line 16 = 29:8; and an indentation marks a new paragraph on line 22 = 29:13. There are spatiums marking complete verses: in line 14 = 29:8, line 25 = 29:15; line 28 = 29:18. Editors marks set off 29:13,14 in lines 22 to 25.
Editorial additions:
Line 1: 5th word: (28:24) Q = a yod is edited above “ve-shadad” making it read “ve-yishdad as in M.
Line 4: before 8th word, (28:28): Q = 1st word in vs 28 in M ​​is omitted in Q. See below in variations. 8th word: waw is edited above to make Q "yadak" read "yudak" as in M.
Line 5: above 2nd word: (28:28) Q = "gilgal" is edited to read as M.
Line 17: 3rd word : (29:9) Q = a “he” is edited above a misspelled word. The “he” does not correct the spelling nor fit the word but may be euphonic ta make an open syllable.
Line 20: 2nd word: (29:11) Q = adds an article to “sepher.” M = the kithuv is the same as the edited Q but the qer'e: is "sepher" (without article).
Line 26: 5th word (29:15) Q = a euphonic waw is added after (not before as would be expected) aleph in "ro'e:nu."
Line 27: 3rd word (29:16) Q editor added a waw to “yo’mer” for pronunciation.
Variations of the Q text from the Masoretic:

Line 2: 2nd word: (28:25) spelling: Q = ve-kiymon and M = "ve-kamon."
Line 3: 1st word (28:26) Q = "ve-yisre:hu" and M = "ve-yissero." It is the same word but Q has a different spelling for the 3ms suffix. Q = hu and M = o. 3rd word: Q omits yod found in M ​​in "e'lohayv." 8th and 10th words : Q omits waws (o sounds) found in M ​​which is the opposite of what is usually found.
Line 4: 1st word: (28:27) Q = "yasuv" and M = yusav." 8th word: (28:28) Q omits "lechem"(bread) which is the first word in this verse in M. In Q the 2nd from last word in this line: an infinitive of emphasis (lit: threshing he shall thresh) Q spells the word "'adash" as "hadash" and M = " 'adosh.'
Line 6: 1st word: ( 28:29) Q omits aleph found in M ​​at the end of 'hiphliya' . ) and M = "metsuroth" (fences or ramparts). Line 12: next to last word: (29:6) Q and M have the same spelling but an editor has placed 2 dots under the waw indicating that the M spelling was not acceptable to him in Q. See the 2 dots below and in line 12 above. The dots indicate what the editor felt was a mistaken letter and is not a vowel point. Without the dots the spelling of this word is i dentical to M. See other corrections using dots in the introduction page

Line 13: 6th word: (29:7) Q has go'yiym spelled with aleph not done so in M.
Line 14 first word: The Q scribe often writes daleth and resh in reverse where it should be resh you find daleth and where you should find daleth he wrote resh. For an example of this often found anomaly compare the first word in line 14 with the 6th word in line 9.
Line 15: 3rd word: (29:8) Q = plural "naphshayv" and M = singular "naphsho."
Line 16: 2nd word: (28:8) (repositioned waw: Q = "sheqoqah" and M = "shoqe:qah"
Line 17: 3rd word: (29:9) a mispelling in Q = "hithshasha-u" This The word has a tau edited over it resulting in "hithshatesha-u" and M = "hishta-'a-she-u" which rhymes in meter with the first word of this verse. This verse contains multiple alliterations and play on words 6th and 7th words: Q = "ve-l'o mey-yayin" and M = ve-l'o yayin" 9th word: The . word in Q is obscure and crowded; in harmony with context it should read "me:-l'o" but only "me-l" is visible M = "ve-l'o.
" suffix 2mpl: Q = "kemah" and M = "kem."
Line 20: 8th word: (29:11) Q = verb imp "va-yo'mer" and M = verb perf. "va-'amar." Last word: Q = "ve-nathnu" and M = "ve-nithan."
Line 21: 11th word : (29:12) as in the 8th of the last line Q = va-yo'mer" and M = "va-'amar."
Line 23: 4th word: (29:13) Q = " yarath" and M = "yiratham;" 10th word: (29:14) Q = "hineh" and M = "hine:niy;" 11th word (29:14) Q = “adonay” not found in M.
Line 24: words 1, 5, 6 “pela” should end with aleph. Q scribe wrote the final one for each. Writing he for aleph is a frequent Q error.
Line 25: Last word: (29:15): Q = imp 3ms "va-yehiy" and M = perf. 3ms "ve-hayah."
Line 26: 9th and 10th words : (29:16) Q writes two words and M = same as one word: Q = “haphek mikem” and M = “haphek-ke-kem.” The meaning is the same. Word 12 is the next to last in this line. It is " 'im-ke-cham" (with as heat?) (likely a misspelling leaving out a final resh) M = " 'im-kechomer" (by-as clay) with resh added to Q it then corresponds with M Line 27
: 9th word: (29:16) another misspelling? Q = "chomer" and M = "'amar." probably more than a mispelling because the text calls for "'amar" (say) but the scribe wrote "chomer" (clay) which is in the context but would not fit in this sense. It is a human error and passed over by editors who usually correct such errors..
Line 29: 5th word (29:18) Q = add a final "he' to "u-me:'ophel" not in M.

This is the word trace from the Bible Dictionary:
Bible > Strong's > Hebrew > 7123
◄ 7123. qera ►
Strong's Concordance
qera: to call, read out or aloud
Original Word: קְרָא
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: qera
Phonetic Spelling: (ker- aw')
Short Definition: read
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
(Aramaic) corresponding to qara
Definition
to call, read out or aloud
NASB Translation
called (1), proclaimed (1), read (7), shouted (1), summoned (1).
Brown-Driver-Briggs
[ קְרָא ] verb call, read out, aloud (see Biblical Hebrew I. קרא ); -
Pe`al Imperfect 3masculine singular יִקְרֵה Daniel 5:7 , 1singular אֶקְרֵא Daniel 5:17 ; 3masculine plural יִקְרוֺן Daniel 5:15 ; Infinitive meaning Daniel 5:8 ; Daniel 5:16 ; Participle active קָרֵא Daniel 3:4 +; —
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
call, cry, read
(Aramaic) corresponding to qara' -- call, cry, read.
See HEBREW qara'
Forms and Transliterations

אֶקְרֵ֣א אקרא יִקְר֔וֹן יִקְרֵ֞ה יִתְקְרֵ֖י יקרה יקרון יתקרי לְמִקְרֵ֔א לְמִקְרֵ֗א למקרא קֱרִ֖י קֱרִ֧י קָרֵ֣א קָרֵ֤א קָרֵ֨א He said
'eq·rê 'eqrê ekRe kaRe keRi lə·miq·rê lemikRe ləmiqrê
qā·rê qārê qĕ·rî qĕrî yikReh yikRon yiq·rêh yiq·rō·wn yiqrêh yiqrōwn yiṯ·qə·rê yitkeRei yiṯqərê

Links

Interlinear Greek • Interlinear Hebrew • Strong's Numbers • Englishman's Greek Concordance • Englishman's Hebrew Concordance • Parallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Strong's Hebrew 7123
11 Occurrences

'eq·rê — 1 Occ.
qā·rê — 3 Occ.
qĕ·rî — 2 Occ.
lə·miq·rê — 2 Occ.
yiq·rêh — 1 Occ.
yiq·rō·wn — 1 Occ.
yiṯ·qə·rê — 1 Occ.


Hebrew text again:
יב וְנִתַּן הַסֵּפֶר , עַל אֲשֶׁר לֹא - יָדַע סֵפֶר לֵאמֹר -- קְרָא נָא - זֶה ; .​​​​ ​{ ס }
two letters, this is the Sefer on Asher, to say goodbye to the Sefer, to Mor Kara Nazih, to Viamar, if you say goodbye to the Sefer

And here we find them in the first paragraph: They translate יִתְּנוּ אֹתוֹ אֶל יוֹדֵעַ הספר They translate it to ( they give it to
the scholar of the book)... The correct translation is: (they give it to the scholar of the book) or ( to the scholar of the book ) .
And likewise in the second paragraph : וְאָמַר לֹא יָדַעְתִּי סֵפֶר They translate it and he says I do not know the book .
The correct translation is : And he said I do not know the book, meaning reading. If the sentence had been I do not know the book, it would have been written in Hebrew like this : וְאָמַר לֹא יָדַעְתִּי לכתוב .







Fourth: The Greek text remains the strong argument against them because it is the original text in which their book was written and from which all other translations were made. Let us achieve this:

Clarke's Commentary on the Bible

I cannot; for it is sealed "I cannot read it; for it is sealed up" - An ancient MS. and the Septuagint have preserved a word here, lost out of the text; לקרות likroth, (for לקראות ), αναγνωναι anagnonai , read it .

Isaḯas 29:12​​​​​​​​​ επιϲταμενου γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι αυτω · αναγνωθι ταυτα και ερι . ουκ αιπιϲταμαι γραμʼματα

Isaḯas 29:12 Kai dothisetai to livelion all of them are chiras anthropou: mi epistamenou gramʼmata ˙ kai eri afto: anagnothi tafta kai eri. ouk aipistamai gramʼmata

Again, the verse in Isaiah 29:12 reads :
[ Or the scroll will be given to a man who does not know how to read in the cave of Hira, and it will be said to him, “Read this,” and he will say, “I do not know how to read.” ] Isaiah 29:12
By looking at the manuscript of the Book of Isaiah under study, we will find that the commentators of the Bible have hidden the word ειϲ χιραϲ .. touto eis chiras .. which means in the cave of Hira.
Let us analyze this matter.
First, let us take the Greek text in the Sinaiticus manuscript and see what we will find. Isaiah 29, text 12

και δοθη ϲ εται το βιβλι ον τουτο ει ϲ χιρα ϲ ανθρωπου ·​​​​ γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι αυτω · αναγνωθι ταυτα και ερι . ουκ αιπι ϲ ταμαι γραμʼματα

Isaḯas 29:12 Kai dothisetai to livelion all of them are chiras anthropou: mi epistamenou gramʼmata ˙ kai eri afto: anagnothi tafta kai eri. ouk aipistamai gramʼmata

What does it mean written here:











http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/manuscript.aspxbook=14chapter=29lid=enside=rverse= 12zoomSlider=0

Let's go to the foreign translations to discover a new phrase in the text that the Arabic translations will not mention

. First, we take this phrase “ ον τουτο ειϲ χιραϲ ” touto eis chiras

. Then, second, we see what this word means: “ ανθρωπου ” anthropou.

First, this phrase “ ον τουτο ειϲ χιραϲ ” touto eis chiras.

This phrase has been deleted: ον τουτο ειϲ χιραϲ “ touto eis chiras deliberately because I did not understand it at the time, and now look at what it translates


: And the text is translated from another website

in Arabic , French, and German : γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι​​​​​​​​​​​​​ And the translation of the







text from ancient Greek into English clearly states that they did not know how to read..

And since the Sinaiticus manuscript was written in capital letters as we will see, and since the small letters were


added later due to their lack of understanding of the obscure words at that time or because they were new to them, such as the word Cave of Hira ειϲ χιραϲ, and thus they added the small letter ε, which by adding it changed the complete meaning of the word, so it became from (Cave of Hira) to (hands).. And by examining the manuscript in our hands, we will find how this letter ( ( ε) is clearly inserted between the capital letters .. This is so that the word becomes εἰς χεῖρας which means (in the hands) .. after it was ειϲ χιραϲ which It means the Cave of Hira. Perhaps this happened because in the third century they did not know the word (Hira) and thus the word was strange to them.. Or when they knew that this incident had happened to Muhammad, the Messenger of God, in the Cave of Hira, we see that they added this interpolated letter ( ε ) to the manuscript. However, the manuscript confirmed to us the tampering of hands once again in the most important texts ever .. If we examine the word χιραϲ after correction and modification or adding the letter ( ε ) the Greek epsilon in one of the other texts such as the text


















Job 4 verse 3:

ει γαρ ϲυ ενουθετηϲαϲ πολλουϲ .

We find that the letter ( ( ε epsilon) is clearly visible, which confirms that the copyist knew and differentiated between the two words

και χειραϲ and ταϲ χιραϲ .. as we notice that this letter is large ( ( ε ) and well-proportioned. Which means that the copyist of the manuscript In the third century, there was a distinction between ειϲ χιραϲ and και χειραϲ , knowing that the Greek letter ε e is capitalized, as we notice here .. Link to this text : http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/manuscript.aspxbook=32chapter=4lid=side=rverse=3 zoomSlider=0 The text came in Acts 21, verse 11 , without adding the epsilon, as you can see: και ελθων προϲ ημαϲ και αραϲ ειραϲ ειπεν​​​​​​​​​​ ταδε λεγι The text , as you can see , is without modification, ταϲ χιραϲ , that is , without any addition other than the addition of the Greek letter ε epsilon . This means that the copyist of this manuscript , as we said before, was differentiating Indeed, between the two words και χειραϲ and ταϲ χιραϲ . . http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/manuscript.aspx… The question that arises now is: Is the word that came in Isaiah ταϲ χιραϲ a mistake by the copyist who forgot this letter?... or The copyist of this manuscript was actually distinguishing between the two words: το ῦ το ε ἰ ς χε ῖ ρας and το ῦ το ε ἰ ς χ ῖ ρας .. And this is the link to this text from the modern Bible, the distorted modern Greek translation: http:// www.**********.com/ArabicBible/lxx/Isaiah/29


































So why this deception? Let us return to the text as it came in the Sinaiticus manuscript .. Isaiah 29, text 12 . επιϲταμενου γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι αυτω ·αναγνωθι ταυτα και ερι . In order to further mislead , they began to challenge the text, but instead of citing what is in the text of Isaiah, they began to cite another text found in the Gospel of Matthew that has no relation to the text under discussion at all. This is the text after adding the Greek letter e, which is found in the Gospel of Matthew 15. :2 and 17:22 and 18:8and 19:13 and they cite it in the Book of Isaiah in order to mislead:

This is because adding the letter epsilon to the word changes its meaning completely:


remember a second and third time “This takes place in the Cave of Hira . ”

The Greek text remains the permanent and strong argument against them.

καιδοθηϲεταιτοβιβλιοντουτο ειϲ χιραϲ .
​ουκαιπιϲταμαιγραμʼματα

Isaḯas 29:12 Kai dothisetai to livelion all of them are chiras anthropou:
mi epistamenou gramʼmata ˙ kai eri afto: anagnothi tafta kai eri. ouk aipistamai gramʼmata
It is clear in the manuscript in front of you that the letter ε was added




. Now what does this word “ ανθρωπου ” anthropou mean, which is found in the same text:

και δοθη ϲ εται το βιβλ ιον τουτο ει ϲ χιρα ϲ ανθρωπου · μη επι ϲ ταμενου γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι αυτω · αναγνωθι Isa 29:12 says that all mankind has the right to be anthropomorphized : that is, all mankind has the right to be anthropomorphized: that is ,

all mankind has the right to be anthropomorphized: that is, all mankind has the right to be anthropomorphized: that is, all mankind has the right to be anthropomorphized .

It means man: Therefore the correct translation of the verse is: Or the book is given in the cave of Hira to a man who does not know how to write, and it is said to him: “Read this.” And he will say, “I do not know how to read.” Isaiah 29:12 So what about the word “book” in the text? Back to the Hebrew text: “ Where is the book of the Lord of the Lord?” Finitein Ha-Sevier Ala Asher Liwa’id Sefer Lemur Kra Nazih Vayamar Law The word Sefer ( Sefer ) appears in the Old Testament 186 times and is translated as book or scroll. The Greek text :​ γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι αυτω · αναγνωθι ταυτα και ερι . Since gramata (gramata) in Greek also means writing and not a book or a book ... and therefore it is an adjective for someone who does not know how to write ... like the word kheras ( χιρας) which means ( Cave of Hira) which is a word originally found in the Septuagint in Greek and not in the Hebrew text. Also, the text of the Septuagint, according to many manuscripts such as the Alexandrian and others, supports the word Khiras χιρας without distortion. Therefore, all the texts presented to the Septuagint are χιρας meaning (Cave of Hira)... and not as it is written χε ῖ ρας meaning (hand) as in the following distorted text: ( LXX) The Church is here to help you .






































γράμματα τα. Now what does this word “ ανθρωπου ” anthropou mean , which is found in the same text : γραμʼματα ˙ και ερι​​​​​​​​​​​​​ And this book shall be given to all men : and ... given into the hands of a man that is unlearned , and shall say to him, Read this; and he shall say, I am not learned . My mother's man. The correct translation of the verse is: [Or the book is given in the cave of Hira to a man who does not know how to write, and it is said to him, “Read this.” And he says, “I do not know how to read.”] Isaiah 12:29 And in the end, the first meeting was between our master Gabriel, peace be upon him, and the Seal of Humanity, may God bless him and grant him peace. Allah's peace and blessings be upon him in the Cave of Hira. http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/manuscript.aspx… Follow the text in different languages..

Follow the text in different languages..







Back again to the Arabic text:
And its literal Arabic translation is as follows: “So all your visions became obscure, like the words of a sealed book
. You hand it to someone who can read and say to him, “Read this.” He replies, “I cannot, for it is sealed.” Then you hand it to someone who cannot read
and say to him, “Read this.” He replies, “I cannot read.” Isaiah 29:11-12

This text records the great moment in which the revelation begins to descend upon the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace .
In Sahih Al-Bukhari, on the authority of the guardian of Islam and its narrator, the Mother of the Believers, Lady Aisha, may God be pleased with her , she said:
The first revelation that the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, began with was the good dream in his sleep. He would not see a dream except that it would come like the break of dawn. Then seclusion became beloved
to him, and he would seclude himself in the cave of Hira and perform tahanth there - which is worship - for a number of nights before he went to his family.
And he would prepare provisions for that, then he would return to Khadija and prepare
provisions for the same, until the truth came to him while he was in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him and said: Read. He said: “I cannot read.” He said: “So he took me and covered me until I was exhausted, then he let me go and said: Read. I said: I cannot read ( קרא ) .
So he took me and covered me a second time until he reached I exerted myself, then he let me go and said: Read. I said: I am not a reader ( קרא ) . So he took me and covered me a third time, then he let me go.
Then God Almighty said in Surat Al-Alaq: {Read in the name of your Lord who created (1) Created man from a clot (2) Read, and your Lord is the Most Generous (3)}. End quote.
God Almighty says in Surat Ar-Ra’d: “And those who disbelieve say, ‘You are not a messenger.’ Say, ‘Sufficient is God as a witness between me and you, and whoever has knowledge of the Book.’” (Ar-Ra’d: 43)
Allah the Almighty says, explaining that this prophecy is with them and warning them against lying and slander..
(And do not argue with the People of the Scripture except in a way that is best, except for those who commit injustice among them, and say, "We believe in that which was revealed to us and revealed to you. And
our God and your God is one, and we are Muslims [in submission] to Him. {46{ And thus We have revealed to you the Book. So those to whom We gave the Scripture believe in it. And
among these are some who believe in it and do not deny it. {47} None rejects Our verses except the disbelievers. {48} And you did not recite before it any scripture, nor did you inscribe it with your right hand. Then the falsifiers would have had doubts. {49}
Rather, they are clear verses within the breasts of those who have been given knowledge. And none rejects Our verses except the wrongdoers. {49} (Al-Ankabut: 46-49)
(Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered prophet, whom they find written in what they have of the Torah and the Gospel. He enjoins upon them what is right
and forbids them what is wrong and makes lawful for them the good things and prohibits for them the bad and relieves them of their burden and the shackles which were upon them.
So those who believe in him, honor him, support him and follow the light which he has revealed to them - It was sent down with him. Those are the successful ones. (Al-A’raf: 157)

additional notes

 When translating Greek texts, I pointed out and noted that I was using
ancient Greek dictionaries, not modern ones. We all know that in different languages, the meanings of words change
according to the circumstances of the era. Language is a social phenomenon, as sociologists know.
Therefore, if you gave an English text from any of Shakespeare’s plays
to any English student born in the modern era, he would not understand a single word or letter of it,
because it is written in the ancient classical English language. A dictionary is needed to explain the meanings of the words.
This is known in all languages ​​of the world, even the Arabic language and pre-Islamic poetry. We need dictionaries
that can decipher the symbols and mysteries of words and phrases, while in their time they were easy and accessible.
Hence, when I chose to translate a Greek text, which is an argument between me and you, I chose
the ancient Greek text, not the modern one...which completely destroys your response to me...because you should have cited the same references...and by the way, there are choices in translation, and let me give you an example of what I said,
which you know very well because I referred to it and you did not mention it in your response.

The ancient Hebrew text says I do not know how to read.

The modern Hebrew text says: I am not educated.


Both give the same meaning.

This is what we mentioned. We brought you the distortion in the text by adding the inserted letter
( ε ) in the manuscript .



Perhaps this addition occurred because in the third century they
did not know the word (Hira) and thus the word was foreign to them . However , the manuscript confirmed to us the tampering of the hands once again in the most important texts ever . The Greek text remains the permanent and strong argument against them. It is clear in the manuscript before you the addition of the letter ε][ . If we examine the word [χιραϲ] after the correction and modification or the addition of the letter (( ε the Greek epsilon) in one of the other texts such as the text of Job (4:3) : ειγαρ ϲυ ενουθετηϲαϲ πολλουϲ . και χειραϲ αϲθενουϲ παρεκαλεϲαϲ We find that the letter (( ε epsilon is clearly visible , which confirms that the copyist knew and differentiated between the two words καιχειραϲ and ταϲχιραϲ.. where we notice that this letter is large (( ε and well-proportioned . Which means that the copyist of the manuscript in the third century was differentiating between ειϲχιραϲ] and [ καιχειραϲ knowing that the letter [ε e] the Greek epsilon is large as we notice here .. The link to this text : http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/manuscript.aspxbook=32chapter=4lid=side=rverse=3 zoomSlider=0 The text came in Acts 21:11, without adding the epsilon, as you can see: καιελθων προϲ ημαϲ και αραϲ ειραϲ ειπεν​​​​​​​​​​​ ταδε λεγι δηϲουϲ ι εν​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ϊερουϲαλημ οιϊουδ αιοι καιπαρα , and the text, as you notice, is without modification [ταϲχιραϲ] , that is, without an addition other than the addition of the letter [ε], the Greek epsilon .



























While the manuscript before you has the Greek letter epsilon, this means
that the copyist of this manuscript, as we have previously said, was already distinguishing between the two words
[καιχειραϲ] and [ταϲχιραϲ .
. http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/manuscript.aspx…
The question that arises now is : Is the word that came in Isaiah [ταϲχιραϲ] a mistake by
the copyist who forgot this letter? ... Or did the copyist of this manuscript actually differentiate between the two words : τοῦτοεἰςχεῖρας] and [τοῦτοεἰςχῖρας ..
And this is the link to this text from the modern Bible, the modern distorted Greek translation:
http://www.**********.com/ArabicBible/lxx/Isaiah/29
And the modern Greek text after modification is as follows:
http://biblehub.com/interlinear/apostolic/isaiah/29.htm καιδοθηϲεταιτοβιβλιοντουτο ειϲ χιραϲ ανθρωπου· μηεπιϲταμενουγραμʼματα˙καιεριαυτω·αναγνωθιταυτακαι ερι. ουκαιπιϲταμαιγραμʼματαIsaḯas29:12 Kai dothisetai to livelion all but chiras anthropou: miepistamenou gramʼmata˙kai eri afto: anagnothi tafta kai eri. Shame on you for citing from the Gospel of Matthew and leaving the original text from the Book of Isaiah. This is enough for us, your entire response revolves around fabrication in the origin of my study.